My heart breaks for the generation raised on screens. They are under the most severe and insidious assault by the ruling class, and it’s from every direction, not least of which is the direct CIA-to-developing brain pipeline which is the smart phone/social media. I also pity the parents who have a Herculean job on their hands of trying to protect their kids from these anti-human/pedo-predatory psychos. And god help the unlucky offspring of “normie” parents who believe “our” institutions (all of which are owned/controlled by that class) are actually looking out for their and their family’s health/well-being, obliviously sending their children off to indoctrination camps, taking them to the pediatrician for their routine poison injections, buying them the latest MKUltra devices, and feeding them toxic Franken-foods, etc. etc.
100% it’s another op to diminish and degrade men even further. Now the predator class would like us to think there are two types of men - soy boys or these ‘macho’ imbeciles. Real men of course are God fearing men with real morals and goodness.
Amazing and frightening both, that people can't connect the dot's between low level 'performers' like the Tates, and the 'top drawer' maniacs who employ the very same memetic devices to take the world over the brink.
Now that "Daddy Trimpf" has pulled the trigger over Iran - unleashing consequences not even dreamed of in the west - his role as ultimate 'mano a mano' made man of the Lansky Mafia will be on display for all who choose to see. Mr "Grab em by the pussy" is in fact the 'ultimate pussy' - a puppet of a cabal of madmen who's terror of the womb and the 'wombosphere' produces a psychotic need to pull the entire world down with them.
We're not talking about "Iran's revenge" or 'bombs beyond bombs' at this point. The signal collapse of all opposition to the Trump Team's demolition of the last threads of national sovereignty will simply ignite a firestorm of karmic retribution on their own. The "New Cyrus" has completed a mission he was bred for. And taking along not just his dopey followers, but everybody else in the west - 'innocent' or not - is what's about to come out of it. Kabbalist's escape from the consequences of their own serial crimes against humanity. Westerners take on those same consequences as sacrificants self chosen and auto-asphyxiated dupes fooled once again into believing Trimpf didn't actually mean what he said, before the 'election' performance even happened!
For preaching, I defer to the words of Louis Farrakhan, the guy who successfully analyzed all the BLM etc., bs as just another attempt to make blacks pawns in the kabbalist's shell game: he told Trimpf(in his 45 iteration) -
"If you do this, you will bring about the death of the greatest nation that has been on this Earth in the last 6,000 years.”
For those of us unfamiliar with Tate, does he talk about other numbers too besides 3, 9, 33? I always wonder when I see an analysis that “this must be Masonic” whether it just so happened that the author selected all the instances the person used 33 but not other numbers, so grateful for your thoughts!
You may be unsurprised to hear that staunch feminists have also attempted to listen to hundreds of hours of Tate and tried to figure out what he is repeating. One such feminist is Zawn Villines, in this article:
Like you, she ends up scratching her head while she’s listening, thinking, er, this doesn’t sound like a heterosexual man at all!! And like you, she doesn’t think there’s anything wrong with being gay but pretending to be something you’re not is disingenuous.
She writes:
—
“Liking women is gay
The most powerful hook red pill ideology uses is the notion that it’s gay to like women. The process works like this:
* Convince men to trust a man in authority, or a group of men. Red pillers usually do this by showing off their own success, or by convincing men that joining the movement will help them become more successful.
* Compulsively repeat messages about the importance of male brotherhood. Often it’s simply a matter of repeating the same thing over and over. Andrew Tate likes to talk constantly about how men need their brothers for “battle,” and that this brotherhood is the only real protection men have.
* Once a man is convinced that he needs other men, he then begins to rely on other men as sources of information on how to get more women. Liking or listening to women is gay.”
—
Liking women is GAY?? Does that sound like what a heterosexual man would think?
If a man is heterosexual, I would *expect* him to like women. Not all women obviously, but you get my meaning. And if you like someone, and want to be in a relationship with them, you try to get to know them. You listen to them. You ask questions. You pay attention. You try to do things to make them happy - whether it’s picking a movie she likes to watch, or helping her with a car issue or making sure she isn’t freezing when you go for a walk. Little things that later become bigger things as the relationship gets more serious.
Andrew Tate seems to be telling men that liking women is gay (???) and listening to women is gay. Bro, that’s the worst advice for getting laid by a woman. All the relationship psychology research shows you must listen to your partner to have a great relationship.
Zawn goes on to write:
—
“Over time, red pill men become completely closed off to listening to women about what women want. This is why they believe, for example, that women don’t like sex and that what women want most in the world is a six foot tall man who earns six figures.
This causes men to engage in more and more alienating behaviors. They become worse at sex, worse at relationships, and more hostile to women. But they don’t want to be gay, so they continue listening to men about what women want. Over time, only women with very low standards or very low self-esteem are willing to partner with these men; this confirms their beliefs about women. And because many of them continue to be unable to get any partner at all, they become more and more hostile to women.
Only gay men like women, after all.
This approach reels young men in in several ways. First, listening to women is work. It requires emotional intelligence, learning to be good at sex, personal hygiene, and more.
But also—and this bit is critical for red pill audiences—it absolves men of personal responsibility. If women don’t like you, or think you’re a misogynist, or complain that you’re bad in bed, it’s not because you’re an unlikable asshole. It’s because women are unreasonable. If women are unreasonable, then men don’t have to do anything specific to appeal to them; relationships are an entitlement, and the problem lies with the women who deny men such relationships.
We can see how this notion that listening to women is gay is a breeding ground for resentment, and ultimately for violence against women.”
—-
If this is actually the advice that Tate is giving, then he’s also going against the “personal responsibility “ mantras that the likes of Jordan Peterson are drumming into men. Relationships are WORK. If you like a woman, you do stuff for her and vice versa.
Instead, Tate’s ideology, taken to its logical extreme, will lead to WORSE outcomes for heterosexual relationships…is that the hidden agenda?? To destroy heterosexual relationships? With advice that is apparently giving the veneer of improving them? While tacitly (and explicitly) advocating for the “brotherhood”…an all-male space where men’s main purpose is not to like or do things for women but to impress *other men* and win approval from *other men*?
I think you’re on the right track here, to read and listen to the red pill bros very carefully and see what they’re actually saying, signalling and achieving.
the author you cite is on point. I'm surprised more people don't recognize the obvious homo-erotic currency of the so-called manosphere.
Just the way these guys dress is feminine. All-white outfits, plunging v-necks, flamboyant Liberace-style jackets, handbags and purses, leg-splayed poses for the camera ... hardly what most non-dumbed down folks would consider manly.
I discussed Tate's less-than-manly signalling here:
"Any man who has sex with women because it 'feels good' is gay"
This is textbook Orwellian playbook strategy, employing patently absurd mantras to bamboozle and eventually invert reality inside people's minds.
His would "you rather $#@% Megan Fox with a pussy or Hulk Hogan with a dick" is a conundrum no man will ever face, and his accusation that if you choose the latter you are gay is another example of surreptitious mind conditioning. He's taking young minds where they do not and would not normally go, and presenting them with a scenario in which the heterosexual option is portrayed as the "gay" choice.
Yes indeed. Nothing wrong with wearing feminine clothes if that’s what floats your boat, but yeah, pretending to be hetero when you actually might be gay and gaslighting hetero people that being hetero is in fact “gay” (and using it as a slur while actually intimating you like it) is mindboggling (at best) and sinister (at worst). The level of mental gymnastics required to comprehend what that Megan Fox/Hulk Hogan example…yikes.
Tate is a joke. There are guys on social media making content for men that speak quietly, with facts and who may just saved some young men from making massive mistakes and bad choices.
The manosphere is a stupid term, just because creators are male doesn’t mean they agree or are working together.
Besides showing Jew-hatred, I think you are a feminist pretending to be a men's advocate. There are countless other faces in the manosphere that feminists dismiss or ignore, precisely because they are helping men.
Right on cue, here is Captain Frank with a baseless antisemite accusation!
Your opening line tells us everything we need to know about you, Frank.
Where did I express hatred for Jews? Please, show me. Do I despise the political movement of Zionism and the belligerent child-murdering monster of a nation Zionists created from land they indisputably stole from others?
Guilty as charged.
Do I admire the small portion of Jews, in Israel and around the world, that vocally object to Israel's genocide and war-mongering?
Absolutely. They have backbone you'll never know or show, Frank.
As for your pathetic "feminist" accusation, congratulations - the other guy who publicly made that accusation is a dirty old man in Pattaya who purchases sex from Thai whores and who became rabidly angry after I revealed he'd emailed me saying puberty is the appropriate age of consent. He thinks sex with 13YO girls is no big deal and downplayed Jimmy Moore's behavior after that POS was arrested for molesting a 13YO.
You're in great company, Frank!
Your 'feminist' criticism is either not genuine, or you are officially stupid. Seriously.
I've called out the feminist movement, and identified it for the psy-op that it is, so many times here and on my namesake site that I've lost count. Read and learn, oh bearer of false accusations:
The Jews did not “steal land”, as you claim. There was the UN Partition Vote in 1947 which called for a Jewish State and a Palestinian State. The Jews were for it, the Arabs were against it. But the UN voted to approve the plan. Right on cue, the Arabs attacked. Jews want to share, Arabs don’t
Who are you Frank? Do you want to crawl out from under your rock and reveal your true identity?
Until you do that, the one thing we know for sure about you is that you are completely, utterly full of crap.
The Zionist sh!tf@ckery to seize control of Palestine began in the 1800s, not 1947.
The Brits controlled Palestine for three decades, during which the real terrorists - Zionists - killed and maimed innocent people in pursuit of their land grab.
Guess who gave us such wonderful innovations as the car and truck bombs?
You're just another self-absorbed grub raised on the fiction that you are a perennial victim whose cohorts can do no wrong, even when it involves murdering innocent children.
As for your repulsive claim that Jews want to share, don't give up your day job for comedy, because you're just not funny.
The so-called Jews running Israel (in reality a bunch of non-religious nutters masquerading as a bunch of religious nutters) sure as hell don't. They have broken all agreements and continued to expand into what was left of Arab territory.
The UN’s own data confirmed that, in 1945, Arabs were the majority landowners in every single district in Palestine. Even in Jaffa, 47 percent of the land was owned by Arabs, compared to 39 percent owned by Jews.
The 1947 UNSCOP report admitted: “The Arab population, despite the strenuous efforts of Jews to acquire land in Palestine, at present remains in possession of approximately 85 per cent of the land” (section 164).
Section 165 of the report goes on to note:
“The Arabs consider that all of the territory of Palestine is by Tight Arab patrimony. Although in an Arab State they would recognize the right of Jews to continue in possession of land legally acquired by them during the Mandate, they would regard as a violation of their ‘natural’ right any effort, such as partition, to reduce the territory of Palestine.”
However, if you believe its perfectly reasonable for someone to barge in and demand a majority share in your property, then once settled to start pushing you off the rest of the property, let me know your full identity and postal address. I'll get the legal paperwork to you to sign off on this exact scenario.
Also, to clarify your comment that "Tate does speak up for men" ... are you seriously claiming that in bragging about scamming other men, selling them shitcoins that invariably plummet in value, calling men who enjoy sex with women "gay" (!), and launching lawsuits against men who tell the truth about his sh!tf@ckery, Tate is speaking up for men, and not his globalist handlers?
Paul Elam and Pearl Davis speak up for men. “Badger Live Streams” on Youtube are 4 women and two men that speak up for male issues. There are several men’s issues posters here on Substack. There are men’s advocacy organizations that are now suing the State of California, because they refused to create a comparable men’s commission, and also sued the Selective Service System for it’s obvious sex discrimination against men. Feminists and the media are silent about all of these people - they only want to point the finger at Andrew Tate.
Tate does speak up for men, and he gains a following because nobody in the public eye speaks up for men.
You don't get it, Frank. The reason sensible men don't rise to prominence in the manosphere is the same reason sensible women don't rise to prominence in the feminist movement:
Both are controlled movements.
I've repeatedly posted the video of the late producer Aaron Russo revealing how Nick Rockefeller boasted "we created women's lib" - not to help women, but to push them into the workforce and create a new legion of tax slaves, to disintegrate the nuclear family unit, and to ensure children spent less time with their parents and more time getting inculcated in schools.
If you think the manosphere, with its sexually deviant characters, like your tranny-loving hero Tate, and its heavy use of Masonic symbolism, is not also a controlled movement, then you're about as sharp as a marble.
You are right about Aaron Russo exposing Rockefeller and their support for feminism.
But how is the manosphere controlled? And, why would they want to control it? Feminism was created to antagonize and alienate men, and pit the sexes against each other. How does the manosphere change anything?
There are many aspects to the men’s movement besides Andrew Tate - but they make him look the the bad guy, to make the men’s movement look like bad guys. There are plenty of men and women that stick up for men. Paul Elam, Pearl Davis, the Badger Live Streams on Youtube come to mind, but the media ignores them
Hey Frank,just wondered what you considered jew hatred. I mean, hatred is a very strong word to throw around. What exactly that was said did you think amounted to Jew hatred? Sure, it may have been critical, and you may disagree with what was said....but to call it hatred?
I'm guessing, like all Zionist shills, Frank considers "Jew hatred" to be anything remotely critical of Zionism or Israel, no matter how true it is.
Shouting people down with false accusations of xenophobia is a time-honored tactic of Zionists to quell criticism of their evil behavior, which includes but is not limited to blatant land theft and genocide.
And then there is Dan Bilzarian, but he bit the hand that fed him, so his star is falling. And Jordan Peterson seems to have had a role in promoting these knuckleheads, or am I seeing that wrong(?).
He seems to follow the instruction manual for these pseudo-alphas, namely reel people in with seemingly reasonable mantras (eg promotion of self-responsibility, anti-woke commentary), then begin the drip-feed of increasingly unhinged nonsense.
My heart breaks for the generation raised on screens. They are under the most severe and insidious assault by the ruling class, and it’s from every direction, not least of which is the direct CIA-to-developing brain pipeline which is the smart phone/social media. I also pity the parents who have a Herculean job on their hands of trying to protect their kids from these anti-human/pedo-predatory psychos. And god help the unlucky offspring of “normie” parents who believe “our” institutions (all of which are owned/controlled by that class) are actually looking out for their and their family’s health/well-being, obliviously sending their children off to indoctrination camps, taking them to the pediatrician for their routine poison injections, buying them the latest MKUltra devices, and feeding them toxic Franken-foods, etc. etc.
The cave wall, Our screens, where They put on a performance and get Us to believe it's real. Plato gave Us a clue.
Escape the Cave! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/escape-the-cave
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/more-debate-is-needed-in-medical?publication_id=1767404&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=8h23m&utm_medium=email
100% it’s another op to diminish and degrade men even further. Now the predator class would like us to think there are two types of men - soy boys or these ‘macho’ imbeciles. Real men of course are God fearing men with real morals and goodness.
Amazing and frightening both, that people can't connect the dot's between low level 'performers' like the Tates, and the 'top drawer' maniacs who employ the very same memetic devices to take the world over the brink.
Now that "Daddy Trimpf" has pulled the trigger over Iran - unleashing consequences not even dreamed of in the west - his role as ultimate 'mano a mano' made man of the Lansky Mafia will be on display for all who choose to see. Mr "Grab em by the pussy" is in fact the 'ultimate pussy' - a puppet of a cabal of madmen who's terror of the womb and the 'wombosphere' produces a psychotic need to pull the entire world down with them.
We're not talking about "Iran's revenge" or 'bombs beyond bombs' at this point. The signal collapse of all opposition to the Trump Team's demolition of the last threads of national sovereignty will simply ignite a firestorm of karmic retribution on their own. The "New Cyrus" has completed a mission he was bred for. And taking along not just his dopey followers, but everybody else in the west - 'innocent' or not - is what's about to come out of it. Kabbalist's escape from the consequences of their own serial crimes against humanity. Westerners take on those same consequences as sacrificants self chosen and auto-asphyxiated dupes fooled once again into believing Trimpf didn't actually mean what he said, before the 'election' performance even happened!
Preach man!
I'm just a bystander.
For preaching, I defer to the words of Louis Farrakhan, the guy who successfully analyzed all the BLM etc., bs as just another attempt to make blacks pawns in the kabbalist's shell game: he told Trimpf(in his 45 iteration) -
"If you do this, you will bring about the death of the greatest nation that has been on this Earth in the last 6,000 years.”
No wonder ADL et al hate that dude so much!
I suppose we’re all just bystanders but it’s so clear now that all world politics aided and abetted by the media is one big pre-planned production
Well written. Thank you, Anthony.
For those of us unfamiliar with Tate, does he talk about other numbers too besides 3, 9, 33? I always wonder when I see an analysis that “this must be Masonic” whether it just so happened that the author selected all the instances the person used 33 but not other numbers, so grateful for your thoughts!
You may be unsurprised to hear that staunch feminists have also attempted to listen to hundreds of hours of Tate and tried to figure out what he is repeating. One such feminist is Zawn Villines, in this article:
https://zawn.substack.com/p/what-ive-learned-about-red-pill-ideology?publication_id=666106&post_id=159919111&isFreemail=false&r=qdiky&triedRedirect=true
Like you, she ends up scratching her head while she’s listening, thinking, er, this doesn’t sound like a heterosexual man at all!! And like you, she doesn’t think there’s anything wrong with being gay but pretending to be something you’re not is disingenuous.
She writes:
—
“Liking women is gay
The most powerful hook red pill ideology uses is the notion that it’s gay to like women. The process works like this:
* Convince men to trust a man in authority, or a group of men. Red pillers usually do this by showing off their own success, or by convincing men that joining the movement will help them become more successful.
* Compulsively repeat messages about the importance of male brotherhood. Often it’s simply a matter of repeating the same thing over and over. Andrew Tate likes to talk constantly about how men need their brothers for “battle,” and that this brotherhood is the only real protection men have.
* Once a man is convinced that he needs other men, he then begins to rely on other men as sources of information on how to get more women. Liking or listening to women is gay.”
—
Liking women is GAY?? Does that sound like what a heterosexual man would think?
If a man is heterosexual, I would *expect* him to like women. Not all women obviously, but you get my meaning. And if you like someone, and want to be in a relationship with them, you try to get to know them. You listen to them. You ask questions. You pay attention. You try to do things to make them happy - whether it’s picking a movie she likes to watch, or helping her with a car issue or making sure she isn’t freezing when you go for a walk. Little things that later become bigger things as the relationship gets more serious.
Andrew Tate seems to be telling men that liking women is gay (???) and listening to women is gay. Bro, that’s the worst advice for getting laid by a woman. All the relationship psychology research shows you must listen to your partner to have a great relationship.
Zawn goes on to write:
—
“Over time, red pill men become completely closed off to listening to women about what women want. This is why they believe, for example, that women don’t like sex and that what women want most in the world is a six foot tall man who earns six figures.
This causes men to engage in more and more alienating behaviors. They become worse at sex, worse at relationships, and more hostile to women. But they don’t want to be gay, so they continue listening to men about what women want. Over time, only women with very low standards or very low self-esteem are willing to partner with these men; this confirms their beliefs about women. And because many of them continue to be unable to get any partner at all, they become more and more hostile to women.
Only gay men like women, after all.
This approach reels young men in in several ways. First, listening to women is work. It requires emotional intelligence, learning to be good at sex, personal hygiene, and more.
But also—and this bit is critical for red pill audiences—it absolves men of personal responsibility. If women don’t like you, or think you’re a misogynist, or complain that you’re bad in bed, it’s not because you’re an unlikable asshole. It’s because women are unreasonable. If women are unreasonable, then men don’t have to do anything specific to appeal to them; relationships are an entitlement, and the problem lies with the women who deny men such relationships.
We can see how this notion that listening to women is gay is a breeding ground for resentment, and ultimately for violence against women.”
—-
If this is actually the advice that Tate is giving, then he’s also going against the “personal responsibility “ mantras that the likes of Jordan Peterson are drumming into men. Relationships are WORK. If you like a woman, you do stuff for her and vice versa.
Instead, Tate’s ideology, taken to its logical extreme, will lead to WORSE outcomes for heterosexual relationships…is that the hidden agenda?? To destroy heterosexual relationships? With advice that is apparently giving the veneer of improving them? While tacitly (and explicitly) advocating for the “brotherhood”…an all-male space where men’s main purpose is not to like or do things for women but to impress *other men* and win approval from *other men*?
I think you’re on the right track here, to read and listen to the red pill bros very carefully and see what they’re actually saying, signalling and achieving.
Hi LoWa,
the author you cite is on point. I'm surprised more people don't recognize the obvious homo-erotic currency of the so-called manosphere.
Just the way these guys dress is feminine. All-white outfits, plunging v-necks, flamboyant Liberace-style jackets, handbags and purses, leg-splayed poses for the camera ... hardly what most non-dumbed down folks would consider manly.
I discussed Tate's less-than-manly signalling here:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/the-fake-queer-world-of-andrew-tate
Notice the tweet where he explicitly states:
"Any man who has sex with women because it 'feels good' is gay"
This is textbook Orwellian playbook strategy, employing patently absurd mantras to bamboozle and eventually invert reality inside people's minds.
His would "you rather $#@% Megan Fox with a pussy or Hulk Hogan with a dick" is a conundrum no man will ever face, and his accusation that if you choose the latter you are gay is another example of surreptitious mind conditioning. He's taking young minds where they do not and would not normally go, and presenting them with a scenario in which the heterosexual option is portrayed as the "gay" choice.
Quite sinister, if you ask me.
Yes indeed. Nothing wrong with wearing feminine clothes if that’s what floats your boat, but yeah, pretending to be hetero when you actually might be gay and gaslighting hetero people that being hetero is in fact “gay” (and using it as a slur while actually intimating you like it) is mindboggling (at best) and sinister (at worst). The level of mental gymnastics required to comprehend what that Megan Fox/Hulk Hogan example…yikes.
Couldn't agree more with every word. Only one issue - Megan Fox actually is a transexual, she doesn't "look" like one 😁
Tate is a joke. There are guys on social media making content for men that speak quietly, with facts and who may just saved some young men from making massive mistakes and bad choices.
The manosphere is a stupid term, just because creators are male doesn’t mean they agree or are working together.
I agree. Also, incidentally, Azoulay is exactly the kind of person the FBI would want to hire, no sarcasm intended.
Besides showing Jew-hatred, I think you are a feminist pretending to be a men's advocate. There are countless other faces in the manosphere that feminists dismiss or ignore, precisely because they are helping men.
Right on cue, here is Captain Frank with a baseless antisemite accusation!
Your opening line tells us everything we need to know about you, Frank.
Where did I express hatred for Jews? Please, show me. Do I despise the political movement of Zionism and the belligerent child-murdering monster of a nation Zionists created from land they indisputably stole from others?
Guilty as charged.
Do I admire the small portion of Jews, in Israel and around the world, that vocally object to Israel's genocide and war-mongering?
Absolutely. They have backbone you'll never know or show, Frank.
As for your pathetic "feminist" accusation, congratulations - the other guy who publicly made that accusation is a dirty old man in Pattaya who purchases sex from Thai whores and who became rabidly angry after I revealed he'd emailed me saying puberty is the appropriate age of consent. He thinks sex with 13YO girls is no big deal and downplayed Jimmy Moore's behavior after that POS was arrested for molesting a 13YO.
You're in great company, Frank!
Your 'feminist' criticism is either not genuine, or you are officially stupid. Seriously.
I've called out the feminist movement, and identified it for the psy-op that it is, so many times here and on my namesake site that I've lost count. Read and learn, oh bearer of false accusations:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/why-straight-men-are-losing-interest
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/australia-alcohol-and-toxic-feminism-an-unholy-trinity-of-self-destructive-stupidity
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/why-women-need-to-start-approaching
I even called it out in this very article you are attacking! LOL
Nice try Frank.
The Jews did not “steal land”, as you claim. There was the UN Partition Vote in 1947 which called for a Jewish State and a Palestinian State. The Jews were for it, the Arabs were against it. But the UN voted to approve the plan. Right on cue, the Arabs attacked. Jews want to share, Arabs don’t
Who are you Frank? Do you want to crawl out from under your rock and reveal your true identity?
Until you do that, the one thing we know for sure about you is that you are completely, utterly full of crap.
The Zionist sh!tf@ckery to seize control of Palestine began in the 1800s, not 1947.
The Brits controlled Palestine for three decades, during which the real terrorists - Zionists - killed and maimed innocent people in pursuit of their land grab.
Guess who gave us such wonderful innovations as the car and truck bombs?
That was your beloved Zionists, Frank:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/israels-long-history-as-a-rogue-terrorist
Who raided the the peaceful Arab village of Deir Yassin, and murdered and raped its unarmed civilians, Frank?
Your beloved Zionists did, Frank:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/israels-long-history-as-a-rogue-terrorist
You're just another self-absorbed grub raised on the fiction that you are a perennial victim whose cohorts can do no wrong, even when it involves murdering innocent children.
As for your repulsive claim that Jews want to share, don't give up your day job for comedy, because you're just not funny.
The so-called Jews running Israel (in reality a bunch of non-religious nutters masquerading as a bunch of religious nutters) sure as hell don't. They have broken all agreements and continued to expand into what was left of Arab territory.
The UN’s own data confirmed that, in 1945, Arabs were the majority landowners in every single district in Palestine. Even in Jaffa, 47 percent of the land was owned by Arabs, compared to 39 percent owned by Jews.
Look at this map, Frank, it's true:
https://web.archive.org/web/20051218150647/https://domino.un.org/maps/m0094.jpg
The 1947 UNSCOP report admitted: “The Arab population, despite the strenuous efforts of Jews to acquire land in Palestine, at present remains in possession of approximately 85 per cent of the land” (section 164).
Section 165 of the report goes on to note:
“The Arabs consider that all of the territory of Palestine is by Tight Arab patrimony. Although in an Arab State they would recognize the right of Jews to continue in possession of land legally acquired by them during the Mandate, they would regard as a violation of their ‘natural’ right any effort, such as partition, to reduce the territory of Palestine.”
https://web.archive.org/web/20110301083000/http://unispal.un.org/unispal.nsf/9a798adbf322aff38525617b006d88d7/07175de9fa2de563852568d3006e10f3
A perfectly reasonable stance.
However, if you believe its perfectly reasonable for someone to barge in and demand a majority share in your property, then once settled to start pushing you off the rest of the property, let me know your full identity and postal address. I'll get the legal paperwork to you to sign off on this exact scenario.
Also, to clarify your comment that "Tate does speak up for men" ... are you seriously claiming that in bragging about scamming other men, selling them shitcoins that invariably plummet in value, calling men who enjoy sex with women "gay" (!), and launching lawsuits against men who tell the truth about his sh!tf@ckery, Tate is speaking up for men, and not his globalist handlers?
What faces in the manosphere would you consider to be helping men? I don't disagree that there are SOME, BTW?
Paul Elam and Pearl Davis speak up for men. “Badger Live Streams” on Youtube are 4 women and two men that speak up for male issues. There are several men’s issues posters here on Substack. There are men’s advocacy organizations that are now suing the State of California, because they refused to create a comparable men’s commission, and also sued the Selective Service System for it’s obvious sex discrimination against men. Feminists and the media are silent about all of these people - they only want to point the finger at Andrew Tate.
Tate does speak up for men, and he gains a following because nobody in the public eye speaks up for men.
You don't get it, Frank. The reason sensible men don't rise to prominence in the manosphere is the same reason sensible women don't rise to prominence in the feminist movement:
Both are controlled movements.
I've repeatedly posted the video of the late producer Aaron Russo revealing how Nick Rockefeller boasted "we created women's lib" - not to help women, but to push them into the workforce and create a new legion of tax slaves, to disintegrate the nuclear family unit, and to ensure children spent less time with their parents and more time getting inculcated in schools.
If you think the manosphere, with its sexually deviant characters, like your tranny-loving hero Tate, and its heavy use of Masonic symbolism, is not also a controlled movement, then you're about as sharp as a marble.
You are right about Aaron Russo exposing Rockefeller and their support for feminism.
But how is the manosphere controlled? And, why would they want to control it? Feminism was created to antagonize and alienate men, and pit the sexes against each other. How does the manosphere change anything?
There are many aspects to the men’s movement besides Andrew Tate - but they make him look the the bad guy, to make the men’s movement look like bad guys. There are plenty of men and women that stick up for men. Paul Elam, Pearl Davis, the Badger Live Streams on Youtube come to mind, but the media ignores them
"But how is the manosphere controlled?"
FFS Frank, read the article. Do you always go off like a cocksure, libelous jerk in response to articles you haven't even read?
Hey Frank,just wondered what you considered jew hatred. I mean, hatred is a very strong word to throw around. What exactly that was said did you think amounted to Jew hatred? Sure, it may have been critical, and you may disagree with what was said....but to call it hatred?
I'm guessing, like all Zionist shills, Frank considers "Jew hatred" to be anything remotely critical of Zionism or Israel, no matter how true it is.
Shouting people down with false accusations of xenophobia is a time-honored tactic of Zionists to quell criticism of their evil behavior, which includes but is not limited to blatant land theft and genocide.
These are NOT MEN!
And so-called (VILE) 'feminists' are NOT WOMEN!!
Do I really need to define wtf a MAN and a WOMAN......IS??
Here is just a little hint.......
JUST BECAUSE one is a MALE......does NOT make you A MAN!
JUST BECAUSE one is FEMALE......does NOT make you a WOMAN!
And then there is Dan Bilzarian, but he bit the hand that fed him, so his star is falling. And Jordan Peterson seems to have had a role in promoting these knuckleheads, or am I seeing that wrong(?).
Not familiar with Bilzarian, sounds like he faded away before I started taking a closer look at this manosphere charade.
I briefly discussed Peterson here:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/forget-the-alpha-wankers-heres-what
He seems to follow the instruction manual for these pseudo-alphas, namely reel people in with seemingly reasonable mantras (eg promotion of self-responsibility, anti-woke commentary), then begin the drip-feed of increasingly unhinged nonsense.