Agree. And I also believe MMR can cause autism. I’ve also gone from vaccine hesitant to anti any vaccine since 2019. If I were living my life over again none of my children would receive vaccines - not even Vit K which is given at birth. I’d just eat plenty of food that contains Vit K during pregnancy. (And I’m a nurse 🫣).
Dr Christopher Exley has done brain biopsies of autism and alzheimer patients showing toxic levels of aluminum. He is on Substack and has a great book Imagine You Are An Aluminum Atom.
I'm guessing that you good folks here know that we are being sprayed with MEGATONS of NANOPARTICULATE aluminum that drives degenerative neurological disorders and destroys osteoblasts-- a driver of osteoporosis-- on a 24/7/365 basis. All over this planet. And contrary to the propaganda, this spraying does NOT "cool the planet," it in fact TRAPS THE HEAT IN, INCREASING THE OVERHEATING!!! LET'S PUT THE PRESSURE ON, EXPOSE THE BASTARDS AND GET IT STOPPED!!!
Wouldn't allowing the baby to remain attached to the placenta for as long as necessary instead of immediately clamping and cutting the cord also make the Vit K shot unnecessary?
"No. Breast milk alone does not provide infants with enough vitamin D. Shortly after birth, most breastfed infants will need an additional source of vitamin D through a supplement."
"Breast milk contains little iron. Parents of infants receiving only breast milk should talk to their infant's health care provider about whether their infant needs iron supplements in the first 6 months and afterwards."
Look, I'm sorry, the idea that mother's milk simply doesn't contain enough vitamins on it's own is complete nonsense. At least with B12 they claim a mother consuming "adequate amounts" passes this through the breast milk but apparently there is nothing mother can do to give her baby adequate amounts of iron: so synthetic formula or supplements (direct to baby) it is.
If your science has taken you to the point that you are honestly recommending that artificial infant formula and vitamin/mineral supplements for a 1-month old is more nutritious for human babies than breast milk you've lost the plot.
Maybe it's true if the mother is severely malnourished but I simply don't believe them anymore.
Vitamin K shot is pushed due to regular immediate circumcisions (mutilation). The ostensible reason of course. Just the beginning of the systematic poisoning of children.
Not disagreeing that this shot is to set the table for future 'immunisations' but the maximum that a single dose of vit k could contain would be .05 mcg of Al and while that's not nothing, it's an extremely small amount when compared to other shots.
That said in most cases this shot is still unnecessary however with general lack of delayed clamping and other procedures such as circumcision it does make sense why it became standard procedure. In hindsight I would have still avoided this for my child but it's not in the same realm as others except that it is invasive and mostly unnecessary.
I don’t know enough about it Tonya but sounds feasible. I’ve a friend whose friend left midwifery & would probably agree with that - I must ask her. I think she works privately now. At the end of the day, the baby should get all the vitamins it needs if the mother is eating healthy food. Unfortunately, I’m only studying all this stuff now - we should be teaching it to children at school & letting them grow stuff. We’ve become too dependant on other people for our health - we all need to take responsibility for our health & research / study & implement the changes that are necessary. Big Pharma & Big food companies don’t care about us - it’s all Big business. How many Drs ask ‘what’s your diet like’ when you go with symptoms? Most just write a prescription. It’s what they’ve been taught to do & they are few & far between who use their critical thinking skills. I would suggest that most diseases (inc cancers) can be treated naturally with drastic diet changes / fasting & the use of herbs - preferably in their natural food form by sprinkling on top of salads & dinners. We have been taught to fear cancer instead of seeing it as our body protesting at the junk we feed it. Lots of foods (like garlic) cause apoptosis & others feed cancer (like sugar). 🤷♀️. It’s all very interesting when you dive into it.
I thank you very much for such a bold piece. I totally agree with you. In ALL of his interviews, over all the years, Andrew's story has never wavered. He was the selected scapegoat. His co-author was reinstated simply because he could afford the legal representation and Andrew couldn't. If Andrew did regain his credentials and license, he would never be in a position to give us VAXXED , II and III. I remember watching a YouTube video on vaccines. Seemed authoritative enough BUT out of the blue, stopped her narrative to attack Andrew Wakefield and just as sudden, continue with her talk. I have adopted this as a Litmus Test. Any presenter who does this or any 180 is automatically flagged as suspect/unreliable unless proven otherwise along with the institution he/she is part of - people like journalist New Jo-Lyn, DR John Campbell and journalist Palki Sharma. Another debt I owe Andrew..
Re: "Danish professor Peter C Gøtzsche. I used to have a favorable opinion of Gøtzsche, due to his previous writings on the link between antidepressant use and increased suicide risk. However, after reading his critique of the aforementioned study, my respect for him instantly evaporated."
I agree...
Aluminium in vaccines is another big issue, and I wrote to Gøtzsche about this in 2014.
Well said. The whole Andrew Wakefield episode was a real eye-opener to me. It showed me how "serious" and "professional" people could enthusiastically participate in blatant lies.
For instance, I used to be a fan of a podcast called EconTalk by Russ Roberts, who was an economics professor. He interviewed Brian Deer, the sleazy journalist who stitched Wakefield up. I used to think that Russ Roberts was an independent thinker and truth teller, but he was completely uncritical with Brian Deer and just believed the official story.
There are many good interviews with Andrew Wakefield still up on the internet. You only need to listen for a short while to realise that he is a distinguished, conscientious and caring doctor. Nothing at all as he is portrayed in these disgusting media hit pieces.
If anyone needs evidence to question the motives of the mass media and their tame "experts" in our society, this damning evidence is amply available in its coverage of vaccines and Wakefield.
Wakefield's book, "Callous Disregard" is a stark contrast to Offit's "False Prophets" one. Wakefield's integrity is paramount; Offit's is painfully lacking.
I think a better question is why take a measles vaccine when the "virus" has never been isolated? Based on Dr Christopher Exley research on autism and alzheimer patients, high toxicity of aluminum is found in brain biopsies of both. Aluminum is used in at least 42 vaccines. It is also in processed food, sunscreen, drugs, makeup, bread, powdered milk/baby formula, antacids etc.
In the interview with Malik, Wakefield discusses isolating the MMR vaccine strain of the measles virus in the inflamed gut of children who regressed into autism.
Please give up this anti science CIA scam. No-virus is on a par with flat earth theories , all designed to discredit resistance.
I am well aware of Palmer and his disingenuous arguments.
Highly illustrative of his reasoning is his repeating of the old, convenient, self-serving claim that "Viruses can only multiply in living cells, so they can only ever be obtained from an 'impure' environment."
Note the self-serving implication here: You can only isolate a virus if it is 'multiplying.'
..."during the COVIDiot years we were instructed to spray and wipe down everything in sight until our surroundings reeked like a hospital.
Which begs an obvious question: Why did we need to disinfect inanimate objects to guard against a pathogen that can only survive and replicate inside living hosts?
The Sars-Cov-2 virus, claimed people from the CDC and Fauci’s NIAID masquerading as scientists, “can remain viable and infectious in aerosols for hours and on surfaces up to days.”
Listen virus-believers, you can’t have it both ways. Either a virus can survive outside a host, or it can’t. The Experts™ themselves have proclaimed in a leading medical tabloid that the ‘Sars-Cov-2 virus’ can survive on plastic and stainless steel “up to 72 hours after application.”
Their words, not mine.
Yet we’re supposed to believe, despite having up to a 72 hour window to do so, none of the world’s sophisticated microbiology labs has been able to take a single electron micograph happy snap of a single Sars-Cov-2 virion without first mixing non-purified patient samples with a bunch of other RNA- and DNA-containing material?"
Your question -"Why did we need to disinfect inanimate objects to guard against a pathogen that can only survive and replicate inside living hosts?"
Because viruses are not alive. They are bits of DNA or RNA wrapped in a protein coat. They cannot be categorised as alive as they cannot reproduce by themselves and do not need to respire (as a Bacterium needs to). The type of external coating they have determines the cells they can enter, and how long they can exist and be viable outside a host cell. Some disintegrate very rapidly, some last much longer.
Using bleach or a similar chemical will destroy them.
Because they are so tiny and simple, they can even infect single celled organisms like bacteria - bacteriophages.
"Wakefield discusses isolating the MMR vaccine strain of the measles virus in the inflamed gut of children who regressed into autism."
Wakefield's continued support of the fraudulent (but highly profitable) field of virology is probably the reason why he was elevated to super star (anti-hero) status in the mainstream.
He is 'safe' opposition because he does not threaten the underlying nonsense that the vaccine industry is based around ie 'viruses'.
Viruses are defined as particles, not just gene frags that are everywhere or an EM photo or cytopath effects. No actual virus particle, completely isolated and characterized has ever been found.
I think virology is a scam and the proofs for viruses are lacking in many ways but not sure that it's necessary to purify something to prove it exists.
Imagine you're trying to prove that a virus of some kind exists. You have never seen a virus, only speculated that it exists. First you must find a bunch of replicant particles that seem suspiciously "virus-y". For whatever reasons. Then those suspicious particles must be isolated--seperated from everything else that is non-suspicious non-virus-y particle.
Without isolation, one cannot study the chemical makeup of the suspicious virus-y particles. That's because one would have no certain means of distinguishing between proteins taken from the suspect particles and other non-suspect non-virus-y particles. The same isssue arises regarding identifying intact genetic sequnces from the suspicious virus-y particles versus other non-suspicious non-virus-y particles.
Of course, the same uncertainty applies to testing for "infectivity", self replication, pathogenecity, and transmissibility-contagion. If one doesn't know with certainty exactly how to identify the particles being studied and tested, because of the presenece of other particles and other stuff, one can't learn anything in particular.
You have to separate the object of study from everything else in order to characterize it to see its make up and function. Objects fitting the definition of a virus @ 150nm or so are surrounded by millions of other objects, scraps, etc. So you need the object of interest in a nearly purified glob made from ultracentrifuge density gradient.
Thanks for your comment. I am very concerned by this no-virus scam.
They are bits of rogue DNA or RNA. It makes sense that they exist and fill a vacant environmental niche as a kind of parasite. They are now believed to play a major role in evolutionary change by integrating into the genome and causing mutations. Placental mammals are thought to have arisen as a result of such an integration...who knows?
In the lab, viruses are used in this way to transfer DNA into the genome of cells for various purposes. Florescence can be transferred in this way and is used to reveal which cells are actively responding to experimental interventions.
I have no experience with measles viruses, but I have worked with and isolated other viruses in various labs (insofar as isolating them is possible—from a practical standpoint they exist as arrays of sequences that have different ratios depending on various environmental conditions and replication time which approximate one dominant sequence at any given time. Maybe you might want to categorize them as something different than alive idk, I like to think of them as complicated self-perpetuating poisons/toxins personally, since they cant self-replicate, but whatever they are theyre parasitically replicating gene sequences wrapped in and/or bound to various proteins, fats, or sugars. Theyre hard to see with conventional light microscopes, but one can detect what theyre made of and observe some of what they do. You could gain a lot of clinical practicality from focusing on the terrain, since they can only exist in terrains that they find accommodating them, but I have seen no evidence of them arising de novo from the terrain, though I can conceptually imagine it pretty easily. Viruses definitely exist and cause themselves to be spread wherever they can. Saying they dont exist seems really weird to me. What is it that does all this if not viruses? Denying their existence seems more like an astroturfed misdirection like “flat earth” (dont look at the evidence of geocentrism or any of the dystopian surveillance satellites nasa has put up), or “birds arent real” (dont look into ever improving ornithopter drones), or various other things.
Dude, I'm just here to say, one of my degrees is in microbiology, and I, too, 'isolated viruses' in the lab: in other words, I did enrichment cultures, put them through multiple cycles of PCR and ran some centrifuged cells through gel electrophoresis, looked at the glowing bands (while probably absorbing enough ethydium bromide to make me flourescent) and concluded that the presence of the bands that represented the right weights to have nucleic acid strands the right length represented 'viruses'. They could really have represented fragments of genetic material that came from absolutely anywhere, and I'm pretty sure that if I'd done PCR for long enough I could have pulled absolutely anything out of those gel electrophoreses. We also did the repeat performance of the tobbaco virus experiment and again, if you do PCR for long enough you can get whatever you like out of it. I look back critically now at what I did and wonder how I didn't see the gaping logical holes in the narrative that I was being taught, and just happily went along with the assumptions - some of them pretty baseless - that made me conclude that what I was seeing was evidence of a virus. It could have been, but it also didn't have to be. I'm not fully convinced and I've done the 'isolation' experiments myself; that's probably WHY I'm not fully convinced, because if I've seen the most conclusive things that can be presented and it looked a bit shoddy to me (maybe it's just because I'm a mathematician that anything that isn't absolute looks shoddy to me) I don't know how anyone's expected to believe it's fully conclusive
The toxic aluminium (it doesn't need to be aluminium) triggers the release of 'vitamin a' in the form of retinoic acid into the body which then eats away at epithelial cells (that's what retinoic acid does best), hence the intestine problems. This only appears to occur if the liver if full of the stored retinoids. Baby's and infants are vulnerable due to small livers. Fat people also tend to be more vulnerable.
PS I am not saying retinoic acid (or aluminium) can't serve a positive purpose in the body (I'm also not saying it can) but this is one of the the mechanisms that is causing the intestinal problems and many other problems.
There have been studies conducted on children in Africa with various vaccines without vitamin a and with vitamin a. Without vitamin a there were not having the 'immune response' (getting sick) hoped for. It is now considered best practice to inject poorer African children with vitamin a first to garner an 'appropriate immune response'.
PS - big connection between suicide & said drugs. I know so many people who have committed suicide while on them or while adjusting the dosage. One Dr told a guy that they could cause suicide but he knew, since he was a Christian, that he wouldn’t do that. Went home & shot himself. Only God knows what these drugs do to people’s brains to open them up to kill themselves.
Gøtzsche polices the boundary of permissible dissent about medicine. On Twitter, he blocked me for pointing out there was no evidence of a virus (I don’t remember which one, since they are all fake, but it was probably SARS-Con-2.)
I guess the fact that it was put forth as a possibility at all got pHARMa panties in a wad. But I will say that the probability that the jabs DO create such ills runs close to 100%.
But indeed, Wakefield did not say that the jabs o' toxins caused the issues. Merely speculated and stated more research was needed.
Thank You for pointing out some of the BS They push to cover even speculation that there is a problem with jabs to protect from unicorns.
My youngest son questioned me on vaccines. He wanted the facts. At the time there was a chiropractic association that had published a compendium called 1200 studies. I let my son print the whole stack. He stopped questioning me after that. Granted I had some other arguments. I'm a trained metalsmith and artist. The universities I went to had some strict policies about toxic substances such as aluminum and borax. one whiff of fumes from melted aluminum causes permanent brain damage. Borax had been removed and banned from jewelry studios because skin contact with it can cause organ damage and infertility. I have read the MSDS sheets for these. When I started sharing them from the FDA and EPA sites on facebook those pages got wiped and I got shadow banned and some doctor from the group started viewing my linkedin page. Too many ingredients in vacines are toxins in other fields. If you are looking at vaccines from outside of the health industry, they simply don't make sense. It can not be possible for borax to be toxic when inhaled or contact skin and be safe to inject into your bloodstream. These conversations need to happen with kids so they can spot the lies.
Another thing that critics say is that Wakefield "faked data" in the study. What data could he have faked? The "clinical details and laboratory, endoscopic, and histological findings"? And how would that have supported his claim (that he didn’t even make, but that they say he did) that the MMR causes autism?
And some say that because some of the children experienced the onset of bowel symptoms AFTER their regression, then his theory (that he did NOT even put forth) that there was a progression from vaccine to bowel disease to autism was fraudulent.
I am alternately amused or irritated whenever I come across some lazy, uninformed, mind controlled POS Asshole vomiting up the formulaic "Wakefield" lie.
Hmmm... sounds like I'm leaning towards the irritated mood this morning.
Agree. And I also believe MMR can cause autism. I’ve also gone from vaccine hesitant to anti any vaccine since 2019. If I were living my life over again none of my children would receive vaccines - not even Vit K which is given at birth. I’d just eat plenty of food that contains Vit K during pregnancy. (And I’m a nurse 🫣).
Dr Christopher Exley has done brain biopsies of autism and alzheimer patients showing toxic levels of aluminum. He is on Substack and has a great book Imagine You Are An Aluminum Atom.
Goodness me, Dr. Exley is another victim of the coordinated takedown for his published conclusions of aluminum.
I'm guessing that you good folks here know that we are being sprayed with MEGATONS of NANOPARTICULATE aluminum that drives degenerative neurological disorders and destroys osteoblasts-- a driver of osteoporosis-- on a 24/7/365 basis. All over this planet. And contrary to the propaganda, this spraying does NOT "cool the planet," it in fact TRAPS THE HEAT IN, INCREASING THE OVERHEATING!!! LET'S PUT THE PRESSURE ON, EXPOSE THE BASTARDS AND GET IT STOPPED!!!
https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/
Wouldn't allowing the baby to remain attached to the placenta for as long as necessary instead of immediately clamping and cutting the cord also make the Vit K shot unnecessary?
Well if you look into CDC guidance they say things like this:
https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding-special-circumstances/hcp/diet-micronutrients/vitamin-d.html
"No. Breast milk alone does not provide infants with enough vitamin D. Shortly after birth, most breastfed infants will need an additional source of vitamin D through a supplement."
And:
https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding-special-circumstances/hcp/diet-micronutrients/vitamin-b12.html
"Infants will receive enough vitamin B12 if they:
Drink breast milk from a mother who consumes adequate amounts of vitamin B12.
Drink infant formula."
https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding-special-circumstances/hcp/diet-micronutrients/iron.html
"Breast milk contains little iron. Parents of infants receiving only breast milk should talk to their infant's health care provider about whether their infant needs iron supplements in the first 6 months and afterwards."
Look, I'm sorry, the idea that mother's milk simply doesn't contain enough vitamins on it's own is complete nonsense. At least with B12 they claim a mother consuming "adequate amounts" passes this through the breast milk but apparently there is nothing mother can do to give her baby adequate amounts of iron: so synthetic formula or supplements (direct to baby) it is.
If your science has taken you to the point that you are honestly recommending that artificial infant formula and vitamin/mineral supplements for a 1-month old is more nutritious for human babies than breast milk you've lost the plot.
Maybe it's true if the mother is severely malnourished but I simply don't believe them anymore.
Vitamin K shot is pushed due to regular immediate circumcisions (mutilation). The ostensible reason of course. Just the beginning of the systematic poisoning of children.
I have heard that the Vitamin K shot contains aluminium. We do not use this vitamin shot in the UK.
Disgusting that it is administered anywhere. Thanks for the info
We certainly used to.
Not disagreeing that this shot is to set the table for future 'immunisations' but the maximum that a single dose of vit k could contain would be .05 mcg of Al and while that's not nothing, it's an extremely small amount when compared to other shots.
https://vaxopedia.org/2018/08/25/does-the-vitamin-k-shot-contain-100mcg-of-aluminum/
That said in most cases this shot is still unnecessary however with general lack of delayed clamping and other procedures such as circumcision it does make sense why it became standard procedure. In hindsight I would have still avoided this for my child but it's not in the same realm as others except that it is invasive and mostly unnecessary.
I don’t know enough about it Tonya but sounds feasible. I’ve a friend whose friend left midwifery & would probably agree with that - I must ask her. I think she works privately now. At the end of the day, the baby should get all the vitamins it needs if the mother is eating healthy food. Unfortunately, I’m only studying all this stuff now - we should be teaching it to children at school & letting them grow stuff. We’ve become too dependant on other people for our health - we all need to take responsibility for our health & research / study & implement the changes that are necessary. Big Pharma & Big food companies don’t care about us - it’s all Big business. How many Drs ask ‘what’s your diet like’ when you go with symptoms? Most just write a prescription. It’s what they’ve been taught to do & they are few & far between who use their critical thinking skills. I would suggest that most diseases (inc cancers) can be treated naturally with drastic diet changes / fasting & the use of herbs - preferably in their natural food form by sprinkling on top of salads & dinners. We have been taught to fear cancer instead of seeing it as our body protesting at the junk we feed it. Lots of foods (like garlic) cause apoptosis & others feed cancer (like sugar). 🤷♀️. It’s all very interesting when you dive into it.
"They" want us to believe (for a few dollars...) that our bodies are stupider than THEY are-- NOT!
Thank you, Anthony.
I was aware that Andrew Wakefield did not make the claims ascribed to him.
He was flayed alive, reputationally, all over the media for some time.
Even back then, I was left bemused by the relentless ferocity of the attacks.
I now have a horribly clear understanding of why the authorities did what they did.
They were shit scared that someone would make solid links to adverse reactions of ANY kind.
Here I will add a link to my theory as to why you cannot question let alone challenge any vaccine, as member of a regulated profession.
If you do, your regulator will jump on you and end your career if you don’t immediately shut up about your concerns.
Best wishes
Mike
Link:
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/2698
Did you forget to add the link?
Sorry, got distracted but have now added it.
Thank you.
Yeadon in Da House!
Yo!
I thank you very much for such a bold piece. I totally agree with you. In ALL of his interviews, over all the years, Andrew's story has never wavered. He was the selected scapegoat. His co-author was reinstated simply because he could afford the legal representation and Andrew couldn't. If Andrew did regain his credentials and license, he would never be in a position to give us VAXXED , II and III. I remember watching a YouTube video on vaccines. Seemed authoritative enough BUT out of the blue, stopped her narrative to attack Andrew Wakefield and just as sudden, continue with her talk. I have adopted this as a Litmus Test. Any presenter who does this or any 180 is automatically flagged as suspect/unreliable unless proven otherwise along with the institution he/she is part of - people like journalist New Jo-Lyn, DR John Campbell and journalist Palki Sharma. Another debt I owe Andrew..
Re: "Danish professor Peter C Gøtzsche. I used to have a favorable opinion of Gøtzsche, due to his previous writings on the link between antidepressant use and increased suicide risk. However, after reading his critique of the aforementioned study, my respect for him instantly evaporated."
I agree...
Aluminium in vaccines is another big issue, and I wrote to Gøtzsche about this in 2014.
See my letters:
- https://over-vaccination.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/challenge_to_cochrane_re_vax-safety_and_aluminium.pdf
- https://over-vaccination.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/vaccine_safety_and_aluminium_follow-up_to_cochrane.pdf\
More here: https://over-vaccination.net/aluminium-and-vaccine-safety/
Cochrane...another worse than useless entity...
Hi Elizabeth,
your letter to Gøtzsche was great - I think it would be worth re-posting as a Substack article, if you haven't done so already.
Well said. The whole Andrew Wakefield episode was a real eye-opener to me. It showed me how "serious" and "professional" people could enthusiastically participate in blatant lies.
For instance, I used to be a fan of a podcast called EconTalk by Russ Roberts, who was an economics professor. He interviewed Brian Deer, the sleazy journalist who stitched Wakefield up. I used to think that Russ Roberts was an independent thinker and truth teller, but he was completely uncritical with Brian Deer and just believed the official story.
There are many good interviews with Andrew Wakefield still up on the internet. You only need to listen for a short while to realise that he is a distinguished, conscientious and caring doctor. Nothing at all as he is portrayed in these disgusting media hit pieces.
If anyone needs evidence to question the motives of the mass media and their tame "experts" in our society, this damning evidence is amply available in its coverage of vaccines and Wakefield.
Wakefield's book, "Callous Disregard" is a stark contrast to Offit's "False Prophets" one. Wakefield's integrity is paramount; Offit's is painfully lacking.
I think a better question is why take a measles vaccine when the "virus" has never been isolated? Based on Dr Christopher Exley research on autism and alzheimer patients, high toxicity of aluminum is found in brain biopsies of both. Aluminum is used in at least 42 vaccines. It is also in processed food, sunscreen, drugs, makeup, bread, powdered milk/baby formula, antacids etc.
Hi Stuart,
yes, this is a very good question indeed. Squillions of people injected over the last ~60 years to prevent a non-existent measles 'virus'.
I've written about this here:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/german-biologist-stefan-lanka-bet
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/scam-alert-the-great-measles-con
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/the-fake-child-defense-anti-vaxxer
In the interview with Malik, Wakefield discusses isolating the MMR vaccine strain of the measles virus in the inflamed gut of children who regressed into autism.
Please give up this anti science CIA scam. No-virus is on a par with flat earth theories , all designed to discredit resistance.
https://docmalik.substack.com/p/march-free-bonus-episode-andrew-wakefield
Currer, there is no such thing as a measles 'virus'.
I explain this here, at length:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/german-biologist-stefan-lanka-bet
Please give up this anti-science CIA scam. Viral isolation is on a par with the tooth fairy and Easter bunny, but far more nefarious.
You might want to look at Michael Palmers discussion of this fraudulent no-virus controversy.
https://michaelpalmer.substack.com/p/the-fallacies-of-the-no-virus-doctrine
https://michaelpalmer.substack.com/p/experimental-proof-of-virus-transmission
I am well aware of Palmer and his disingenuous arguments.
Highly illustrative of his reasoning is his repeating of the old, convenient, self-serving claim that "Viruses can only multiply in living cells, so they can only ever be obtained from an 'impure' environment."
Note the self-serving implication here: You can only isolate a virus if it is 'multiplying.'
Says who?
As I wrote here...
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/dear-virology-do-you-have-anything
..."during the COVIDiot years we were instructed to spray and wipe down everything in sight until our surroundings reeked like a hospital.
Which begs an obvious question: Why did we need to disinfect inanimate objects to guard against a pathogen that can only survive and replicate inside living hosts?
The Sars-Cov-2 virus, claimed people from the CDC and Fauci’s NIAID masquerading as scientists, “can remain viable and infectious in aerosols for hours and on surfaces up to days.”
Listen virus-believers, you can’t have it both ways. Either a virus can survive outside a host, or it can’t. The Experts™ themselves have proclaimed in a leading medical tabloid that the ‘Sars-Cov-2 virus’ can survive on plastic and stainless steel “up to 72 hours after application.”
Their words, not mine.
Yet we’re supposed to believe, despite having up to a 72 hour window to do so, none of the world’s sophisticated microbiology labs has been able to take a single electron micograph happy snap of a single Sars-Cov-2 virion without first mixing non-purified patient samples with a bunch of other RNA- and DNA-containing material?"
Your question -"Why did we need to disinfect inanimate objects to guard against a pathogen that can only survive and replicate inside living hosts?"
Because viruses are not alive. They are bits of DNA or RNA wrapped in a protein coat. They cannot be categorised as alive as they cannot reproduce by themselves and do not need to respire (as a Bacterium needs to). The type of external coating they have determines the cells they can enter, and how long they can exist and be viable outside a host cell. Some disintegrate very rapidly, some last much longer.
Using bleach or a similar chemical will destroy them.
Because they are so tiny and simple, they can even infect single celled organisms like bacteria - bacteriophages.
"Wakefield discusses isolating the MMR vaccine strain of the measles virus in the inflamed gut of children who regressed into autism."
Wakefield's continued support of the fraudulent (but highly profitable) field of virology is probably the reason why he was elevated to super star (anti-hero) status in the mainstream.
He is 'safe' opposition because he does not threaten the underlying nonsense that the vaccine industry is based around ie 'viruses'.
This is a good point! How can Dr. Wake still not scream viruses don't exist in 2025...Oh he was doing research with Dazak in the 90s even....
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/instance/499879/pdf/jclinpath00253-0035.pdf
Viruses are defined as particles, not just gene frags that are everywhere or an EM photo or cytopath effects. No actual virus particle, completely isolated and characterized has ever been found.
Freestyle - Wakefield and Mikovits death brigade
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuRXp7dsh60&t=7s
I think virology is a scam and the proofs for viruses are lacking in many ways but not sure that it's necessary to purify something to prove it exists.
Imagine you're trying to prove that a virus of some kind exists. You have never seen a virus, only speculated that it exists. First you must find a bunch of replicant particles that seem suspiciously "virus-y". For whatever reasons. Then those suspicious particles must be isolated--seperated from everything else that is non-suspicious non-virus-y particle.
Without isolation, one cannot study the chemical makeup of the suspicious virus-y particles. That's because one would have no certain means of distinguishing between proteins taken from the suspect particles and other non-suspect non-virus-y particles. The same isssue arises regarding identifying intact genetic sequnces from the suspicious virus-y particles versus other non-suspicious non-virus-y particles.
Of course, the same uncertainty applies to testing for "infectivity", self replication, pathogenecity, and transmissibility-contagion. If one doesn't know with certainty exactly how to identify the particles being studied and tested, because of the presenece of other particles and other stuff, one can't learn anything in particular.
You have to separate the object of study from everything else in order to characterize it to see its make up and function. Objects fitting the definition of a virus @ 150nm or so are surrounded by millions of other objects, scraps, etc. So you need the object of interest in a nearly purified glob made from ultracentrifuge density gradient.
Shill alert. No virus is a CIA disinformation tactic to destroy the credibility of the opposition.
"Shill alert" is no more of an argument than "Pandemic Alert".
If you have credible scientific proof of 'viruses' then by all means share it with us.
I have already put up some links.
Bot alert.
I didnt write my other reply to try to be a jerk, I like your work, I just dont think youre correct, so I gave you my own experience, fwiw.
Thanks for your comment. I am very concerned by this no-virus scam.
They are bits of rogue DNA or RNA. It makes sense that they exist and fill a vacant environmental niche as a kind of parasite. They are now believed to play a major role in evolutionary change by integrating into the genome and causing mutations. Placental mammals are thought to have arisen as a result of such an integration...who knows?
In the lab, viruses are used in this way to transfer DNA into the genome of cells for various purposes. Florescence can be transferred in this way and is used to reveal which cells are actively responding to experimental interventions.
I have no experience with measles viruses, but I have worked with and isolated other viruses in various labs (insofar as isolating them is possible—from a practical standpoint they exist as arrays of sequences that have different ratios depending on various environmental conditions and replication time which approximate one dominant sequence at any given time. Maybe you might want to categorize them as something different than alive idk, I like to think of them as complicated self-perpetuating poisons/toxins personally, since they cant self-replicate, but whatever they are theyre parasitically replicating gene sequences wrapped in and/or bound to various proteins, fats, or sugars. Theyre hard to see with conventional light microscopes, but one can detect what theyre made of and observe some of what they do. You could gain a lot of clinical practicality from focusing on the terrain, since they can only exist in terrains that they find accommodating them, but I have seen no evidence of them arising de novo from the terrain, though I can conceptually imagine it pretty easily. Viruses definitely exist and cause themselves to be spread wherever they can. Saying they dont exist seems really weird to me. What is it that does all this if not viruses? Denying their existence seems more like an astroturfed misdirection like “flat earth” (dont look at the evidence of geocentrism or any of the dystopian surveillance satellites nasa has put up), or “birds arent real” (dont look into ever improving ornithopter drones), or various other things.
Dude, I'm just here to say, one of my degrees is in microbiology, and I, too, 'isolated viruses' in the lab: in other words, I did enrichment cultures, put them through multiple cycles of PCR and ran some centrifuged cells through gel electrophoresis, looked at the glowing bands (while probably absorbing enough ethydium bromide to make me flourescent) and concluded that the presence of the bands that represented the right weights to have nucleic acid strands the right length represented 'viruses'. They could really have represented fragments of genetic material that came from absolutely anywhere, and I'm pretty sure that if I'd done PCR for long enough I could have pulled absolutely anything out of those gel electrophoreses. We also did the repeat performance of the tobbaco virus experiment and again, if you do PCR for long enough you can get whatever you like out of it. I look back critically now at what I did and wonder how I didn't see the gaping logical holes in the narrative that I was being taught, and just happily went along with the assumptions - some of them pretty baseless - that made me conclude that what I was seeing was evidence of a virus. It could have been, but it also didn't have to be. I'm not fully convinced and I've done the 'isolation' experiments myself; that's probably WHY I'm not fully convinced, because if I've seen the most conclusive things that can be presented and it looked a bit shoddy to me (maybe it's just because I'm a mathematician that anything that isn't absolute looks shoddy to me) I don't know how anyone's expected to believe it's fully conclusive
The toxic aluminium (it doesn't need to be aluminium) triggers the release of 'vitamin a' in the form of retinoic acid into the body which then eats away at epithelial cells (that's what retinoic acid does best), hence the intestine problems. This only appears to occur if the liver if full of the stored retinoids. Baby's and infants are vulnerable due to small livers. Fat people also tend to be more vulnerable.
PS I am not saying retinoic acid (or aluminium) can't serve a positive purpose in the body (I'm also not saying it can) but this is one of the the mechanisms that is causing the intestinal problems and many other problems.
There have been studies conducted on children in Africa with various vaccines without vitamin a and with vitamin a. Without vitamin a there were not having the 'immune response' (getting sick) hoped for. It is now considered best practice to inject poorer African children with vitamin a first to garner an 'appropriate immune response'.
Thx
PS - big connection between suicide & said drugs. I know so many people who have committed suicide while on them or while adjusting the dosage. One Dr told a guy that they could cause suicide but he knew, since he was a Christian, that he wouldn’t do that. Went home & shot himself. Only God knows what these drugs do to people’s brains to open them up to kill themselves.
Gøtzsche polices the boundary of permissible dissent about medicine. On Twitter, he blocked me for pointing out there was no evidence of a virus (I don’t remember which one, since they are all fake, but it was probably SARS-Con-2.)
Money makes the world go round. It basically all comes down to greed.
I guess the fact that it was put forth as a possibility at all got pHARMa panties in a wad. But I will say that the probability that the jabs DO create such ills runs close to 100%.
But indeed, Wakefield did not say that the jabs o' toxins caused the issues. Merely speculated and stated more research was needed.
Thank You for pointing out some of the BS They push to cover even speculation that there is a problem with jabs to protect from unicorns.
His name is now used in schools to indoctrinate children against questioning vaccines.
My youngest son questioned me on vaccines. He wanted the facts. At the time there was a chiropractic association that had published a compendium called 1200 studies. I let my son print the whole stack. He stopped questioning me after that. Granted I had some other arguments. I'm a trained metalsmith and artist. The universities I went to had some strict policies about toxic substances such as aluminum and borax. one whiff of fumes from melted aluminum causes permanent brain damage. Borax had been removed and banned from jewelry studios because skin contact with it can cause organ damage and infertility. I have read the MSDS sheets for these. When I started sharing them from the FDA and EPA sites on facebook those pages got wiped and I got shadow banned and some doctor from the group started viewing my linkedin page. Too many ingredients in vacines are toxins in other fields. If you are looking at vaccines from outside of the health industry, they simply don't make sense. It can not be possible for borax to be toxic when inhaled or contact skin and be safe to inject into your bloodstream. These conversations need to happen with kids so they can spot the lies.
Written with the inimitable linguistic flair of an Italian Australian!
To slightly rework one of the best billboard road signs I ever saw in that fair land (IF YOU DRINK AND DRIVE YOU'RE A BLOODY IDIOT)
If you claim that Wakefield said MMR vaccines cause autism, you're f...ing illiterate.
Reading the paper itself about ten years ago is actually one of the things that convinced me that the pro-vax side were liars.
Another thing that critics say is that Wakefield "faked data" in the study. What data could he have faked? The "clinical details and laboratory, endoscopic, and histological findings"? And how would that have supported his claim (that he didn’t even make, but that they say he did) that the MMR causes autism?
And some say that because some of the children experienced the onset of bowel symptoms AFTER their regression, then his theory (that he did NOT even put forth) that there was a progression from vaccine to bowel disease to autism was fraudulent.
Thanks Anthony.
I am alternately amused or irritated whenever I come across some lazy, uninformed, mind controlled POS Asshole vomiting up the formulaic "Wakefield" lie.
Hmmm... sounds like I'm leaning towards the irritated mood this morning.
The other favourite word is “discredited”. These people have no shame.