The real golden turds: The people on the street who still think DJT was actually shot and that the chances of an ear graze are one in ten per shot. Yup, Common Core education gives rise to peanut butter brains.
In my article, “The Three Ways to Decode Information,” I introduce the concept of the ‘official conspiracy narrative’-a narrative designed for those who are skeptical of the mainstream. This narrative, I argue, is a powerful tool that, while seemingly challenging the official narrative, ultimately serves to reinforce it and control the viewer’s perception.
Example:
1) Official Narrative: “Someone was shooting at Trump”
2) Official Conspiracy Narrative: “How did the secret service let someone shoot at Trump?”
3)Unorthodoxy Narrative: “The shooting wasn’t real — the blood is fake. Don’t trust what you see on the television.”
Notice how the first two support the narrative of “shooting” — this is what reality is built on, but the truth is the “shooting” never occurred.
As people grow wise to fakery there comes a narrative between 2 and 3 that says the event was staged but that somehow real bullets were used, there were real casualties nonetheless, ultimately bringing us back to narrative 2.
Thanks for this Alex. In my article, "3 Ways To Decode Official Narratives," I use the case study of 9/11 for example. The official narrative and conspiracy state that airplanes flew into the tower but the unorthodox narrative is that bombs blew the buildings up. In that scenario, the casualties are real outside of the first two narratives. Let me know your thoughts.
Here are two articles: 1st of the 3 narratives and 2nd of deep fake technology and 9/11:
I think your “unorthodox” narrative for 9/11 corresponds to what I call the intermediate narrative: it’s still not calling the attack itself a fake. In both narratives it was a real attack whether by bombs or planes.
Information Operations (psyops) are broken down along these lines, knowing that an official story won't capture everyone, therefore a controlled counter narrative is critical, along with rabbit hole narratives to capture the perpetual rabbit hole seekers.
This event has psyops written all over it. You've made a very astute set of observations in my opinion.
It's truly exasperating. Even when you show them the footage of the three infamous shots being fired AWAY from Trump, they still refuse to accept reality that this was all a charade!
These people are vociferously defending the same parasites who hold them in sheer contempt, who unleashed toxic gene therapies in a deliberate mission to kill them and their children.
People get the leadership they deserve and all that...
The other thing that stuns me about Trump is that so-called 'Christians' and 'conservatives' adore him. There is so much readily accessible information online, straight from the guy's own mouth, showing he is a lowlife sleazeball.
He's repeatedly made inappropriate comments about his own daughter Ivanka, chuckled along while Howard Stern called her a "piece of ass," publicly derided his ex-wife Marla as "nice tits, no brains" (because we all know how much Trump values high IQ in a partner), boasted about grabbing women by the "pussy"...
If your daughter brought home a grub like Trump, you'd drag him out the back, give him a good belting, and send him packing with a stern warning never to come near her again.
I guess conservative values ain't what they used to be...
It's not that complicated ... but oh my goodness. I have a friend who just automatically goes for the 2nd-level propaganda. You can't talk him out of it ... and those in power have us profiled and know that this % will go for this narrative and that % will go for that one, etc.
Psyop of the hoax variety indeed. Good look at yet another glaring bit that shows it was a production to cast sandy hooks into Our emotions and drag Us where They want Us!
Now now, Anthony ... this one's scarcely worth your posting.
Btw: a blogging 'friend' of mine disagreed when I told her it was all bullshit; I was really disappointed when she said in somewhat grandiose manner "I know what I saw". In today's world ???
I agree that nothing can be taken at face value. Perhaps it is because I saw that prior to 9/11, and knew that show was not what They purported it to be when it happened, and so am used to it, that My comments come off as...banal...
Twenty-three+ years of watching play after play and seeing the stage and actors trying to convince Us that what They perform is "reality" - and with the addition of the wag-the-dog element in so much They present - it allows for adjustment.
Does Barbie have her weapon pointed at Trump fans in front of her, between her attempts to holster her gun?? I ask because I can’t see her dark weapon against her dark jacket very well in the video, but once or twice it seems her finger on the gun is at nearly a 90° angle from her body. (Close enough to it to hit a person in front of her.)
FFS You never point a gun at someone you don’t intend to shoot, even if you are sure it’s not loaded, (I’m wondering if hers was unloaded so she couldn’t accidentally shoot her own handlers), even if you’re well-disciplined about keeping your trigger finger along the side of the weapon. A true SS agent would know that (as well as be able to holster her weapon).
Maybe I’m wrong and it was always pointed to the ground, and not directly at the crowd in front of her.
I'm not trying to prove anything here about the (staged or real) assassination attempt, but the video footage of the obviously inept agent only proves that the Secret Service has become, like just about any other organization in the USA, a victim of the DEI doctrine. Kimberly Cheattle, the current director, once stated that she needed to "attract diverse candidates and give opportunities to everybody in the workforce, particularly women." She said she aims to have 30% women in the agency by 2030. As you very well know, any policy that puts group membership above qualifications is destined to result in pearls like Secret Service Agent Barbie. But it doesn't prove anything about a hoax.
"Secret Service agents receive continuous advanced training throughout their careers. In part, this training consists of regular firearms requalification and emergency medicine refresher courses."
However woke we're supposed to believe the SS will be by 2030, there is no way a chubby, fumbling clown who clearly is unfamiliar with a firearm passed the rigorous requirements for becoming an SS agent. She is an actress. A poor one. Just like Trump.
I agree that the purported assassination attempt was theater. A related observation is that the photograph purportedly showing the bullet is an obvious fraud. I present evidence of that fraud here: https://peteryim.substack.com/p/the-magic-bullet
There are always multiple theories to what we perceive. You see an actor. I see an incompetent DEI hire. My perspective makes much more sense to me than yours does.
"Secret Service agents receive continuous advanced training throughout their careers. In part, this training consists of regular firearms requalification and emergency medicine refresher courses."
Look at the head of the SS. She is in worse shape than the "officer". That is the whole thing with DEI... they bend the rules to let any piece of shit in to any position they want. Look who is naive now. Next you will be telling me the Earth is flat because NASA sux.
Greg, stop trying to divert the conversation off to Flat Earth theory, that places you in the same sad camp as Robert Malone, which is not good.
"Look at the head of the SS. She is in worse shape than the "officer". "
Right. Because she is NOT an SS officer, she is a crisis actor.
"That is the whole thing with DEI... they bend the rules to let any piece of shit in to any position they want."
The parasite class take their self-preservation seriously. You won't accept it, but Trump is part of that parasite class. Rules are NOT broken when it comes to protecting themselves.
But if you disagree, go ahead. Find some fat clumsy goof and get them to a position where they are defending presidential candidates. Document the entire process on camera, it'll be a hit documentary for sure.
WTF? TRUMP IS A zIONIST PIECE OF SHIT. But that does not prove the crisis actor BS. You take ignorant leaps to unfounded conclusions. Nothing I said should have made a critical thinker believe I think Trump is a "good guy".
Boy you are easily distracted. And yet, you do not acknowledge that I am not a Trump lover like you claimed. Have fun with your little suppositions. I have better ways to spend my time. Cheers! BTW, Most of your other positions are admirable. No one is right 100% of the time.
Looking at the fact that Biden and members of his team appear to have received the real covid vaccine, based on their health outcomes, I have to seriously doubt that they are part of the protected class you are talking about.
It seems to me that they are seen as expendable pawns, and in which case, yes the SS might have been corrupted intentionally.
Politicians with no military experience are unlikely to know much about the level of preparedness that these agents should have. Just as many civilians have strange Hollywood fuelled delusions about military training and activity.
We know that globalists want to weaken nation states and pit them against eachother in a cynical divide and conquer strategy.
It would make a lot of sense to fail to kill him as well as actually kill him. So what need is there to fake the shooting when a real shooting works just as well?
I'm open to the possibility that it was staged, but I wouldn't base that belief on the idea that these politicians have any idea what they are doing at all. I think they are clowns.
You really do seem to have gathered a cult of sychphants on the channel. 7 years of the FBI, DOJ and HS trying to destroy the President with lawfare that's falling apart and bringing millions to our MAGA party while Oats for Brains retreats to his basement again while jeffries, obama and the wife of the gay Californian drunk work out what to do with him, and you think they're going to turn on a dime and say "He's our man".
Let's murder one of his supporters to make the President a man of compassion and attract so much attention that he wins 48 states (nobody wants California or Oregan anymore).
Hey. If that's what's happening I'll take it.
The President and JD will be so busy breathing life back into a dead country that they won't be worried about you.
No. Steve Bannon, Kash Patel, Peter Navarro, Dan Bongino, James O'Keefe, Tom Fitton, et al, theyre the ones coming after you...they are the President's wing men.
"You really do seem to have gathered a cult of sychphants on the channel." (sic)
No, it's just that my readership is no doubt smarter than you and yours.
Now, Ernie the Coward, would you like to take time out from your incoherent ranting, and thinly veiled threats issued from behind the safety of your computer screen, to explain the glaring discrepancies, documented on video, that show this was a pre-orchestrated hoax?
You can start by explaining how at least one of the three shots caught on camera being fired AWAY from Trump allegedly did a U-turn and clipped him in the ear?
It seems that I was coherent enough to get you to reply. And the threats? The President won't have time for your petty quables. The glaring discrepancies? I've already watched a ton of footage showing different angles from different sources..what makes yours any different. I've seen the videos analysed by people who back the President and those that don't. So you're saying that the people who have spent seven years turning the country into your Marxist paradise of chaos and destruction suddenly turned and said Trump is our man, we'll knock his ear at a rally.
Your readership? I've seen no one opposed you. That's not leadership that's a cult.
A coward? I'm taking you on... behind the computer or not...at 74 I've spent my life opposing shit heads, no reason to stop now.
There is the thought that the shooters first thought was to kill as many in the crowd because although he bought a ladder he didn't use it...he was going to fire from ground level. But your security agencies seemed to want to give him a shot at the King and he took it. He missed. That's why the woman leading the SS was shitting bricks. The plan was to kill the President, investigate the assassination in the same way they investigated the Kennedy assassination (wait 100 years for the truth) and return America to "Normal"
"It seems that I was coherent enough to get you to reply."
No, you were so ridiculously irrational that I felt obliged to reply on compassionate grounds.
"And the threats? The President won't have time for your petty quables." (sic)
Of course he doesn't, he's too busy playing out his role as Zionist bitch boy.
As for your warning that Bannon et al are coming after me, why don't you all come meet me face to face? Without security, just your brave manly selves. You'll need to sign an agreement beforehand acknowledging that the incident may result in physical harm to yourselves resulting from threatening overtones made by Ernie the Boxhead.
Out of curiosity, do you even have permission to speak on their behalves? Or are you just a pathetic little coward trying on the "I'll get my daddy to beat you up" ruse?
"A coward? I'm taking you on... behind the computer or not...at 74 I've spent my life opposing shit heads, no reason to stop now."
I hate to break this to you, Ernie, but you're one of the shitheads. You support a lying sexual deviant.
"There is the thought that the shooters first thought was to kill as many in the crowd because although he bought a ladder he didn't use it...he was going to fire from ground level. But your security agencies seemed to want to give him a shot at the King and he took it. He missed. "
There is the thought you you are suffering incurable cognitive dissonance, and its a compelling one. Once more you have completely failed to explain how THE THREE SHOTS TELEVISED AROUND THE WORLD, COULD POSSIBLY HAVE HIT TRUMP'S EAR WHEN THERE IS VIDEO FOOTAGE SHOWING THEM BEING FIRED AWAY FROM HIM?
Don't normally shout, but I've already asked you this several times and you keep failing to give a coherent answer.
Ernie, why are you even arguing with me when you haven't even watched the footage of the 'assassination attempt'? Do you always argue with people on matters you know nothing about?
I'll make this easy for you, in simple to follow steps:
2. Watch the second video first, it's the one televised around the world. You hear the first three shots. Trump pretends to be shot on the second one. There is a brief pause, then more shots are fired. By that point, Trump is on the ground covered in B-grade actors.
3. Watch the first video, which shows the first three shots did not come from an alleged assassin, but from the nearby security gunman who can clearly be seen firing AWAY from Trump.
4. Provide me with evidence that that rooftop security guy was using bullets capable of reversing direction in mid-air.
I can show you a host of videos dozens of them from all angles and you're asking me to watch one that you, a conspiracy theorist has either chosen or altered? I watch Dan Bongino's extensive interviews (I believe he knows 10x times more than you about SS security...At no time does Dan talk about a dancing bullet.
I'll take the word of a man who was lead in the protection of Clinton, Bush and Obama over you every day of the week.
"Two people died, another two seriously injured. Not a credible hoax, don’t let your opinion of trump cloud your judgement, only discredit yourself."
Who says it's not a credible hoax? Psy-ops almost always feature 'collateral damage' - see Port Arthur Massacre, 9/11, USS Liberty bombing, Columbine shooting for some especially fatal examples.
Not to mention 'COVID' and Operation Warp Speed, which your boy Trump proudly put his signature to.
If innocent people were killed and injured, it was probably from the several shots fired AFTER Trump was already on the ground and smothered by B-grade actors.
We know the first three shots, which were the cue for Trump to launch into his pathetic flinch response impersonation, came from the security sniper on the nearby roof who was firing AWAY from Trump. That is now well documented, as explained here:
Big fan here (and of your friends Richard Nikoley, and Matt Stone). Proud owner of The Fat Loss Bible, and soon to be proud owner of The Great Cholesterol Con.
The video you offer as evidence of falseness: it looks to me like the SS agent on the roof is reacting to Crook’s first shots, not firing the gun himself. And the audio sounds different from any other angle or footage I’ve seen of the event. This is either because: the kid making the Rumble video doctored it, or, the nefariously bad at recording cell phone used is tricking us sonically (I know a little about this, being a professional singer with many frustrating cell phone recordings under his belt lol).
It seems as if it is your opinion that this video shows the “truth”, which is counter to the current “narrative”. In my opinion, it shows the “narrative” is correct: some nut shot at Trump, aided and abetted by a corrupt, inept agency (probably several!) bogged down by DEI standards that supersede the physical standards you have repeatedly posted. I don’t know of your current consumption of American media, but the Secret Service is really getting grilled.
This whole situation smacks of Occam’s razor. The coordination and code of silence required by hundreds of individuals to pull this off seems impossible, and way too complicated to be pulled off by flawed, can’t keep their mouth shut about shite human beings.
For the record, Trump is all the things you say. I like him, I admire him, but I’m pissed at him for Operation warp speed, and not correcting his stance on the vax despite overwhelming evidence he was wrong (also a few other things in his presidency people have forgotten). But now I ask you: if you were an American citizen, who would you vote for? The pederastic, pants-shitting hair sniffer who enables his twisted son, or a business man with all the trappings and flaws and failings of many men in his situation/position? Or would you vote Kennedy? I’ve thought about voting for Kennedy.
I simply think the idea of him needing to fake this to help him win the election is erroneous. Between the horrible condition this country is in after 3.5 years of the current regime, and the aforementioned Kennedy “stealing” votes from Biden and the dems, a cock-a-mamie, complex fake shooting, needing flawless execution of timing and discretion amongst hundreds of individuals, is a bit of a stretch.
I look forward to a response, if you have time. Since this is my first engagement with you in the many years I’ve been following and reading you, I want to say thanks for your health and scientific literature contributions on fitness, nutrition, and obesity and other related conditions/diseases. Truly life changing! I regularly consult TFLB, and as I said before, I am looking forward to reading The Great Cholesterol Con, since I want to arm myself with the case you make, and flip the script on my doctors who are on me about my cholesterol numbers.
thanks for your support, and thanks for posting a conflicting opinion that isn't replete with profanity, insults and threats (big shout out to Merrick and Ernie!)
"The video you offer as evidence of falseness: it looks to me like the SS agent on the roof is reacting to Crook’s first shots, not firing the gun himself."
Then where are the initial shots, followed by the sniper shots? Where is the audio footage showing a volley of opened and returned fire? The video clearly shows the sniper firing off three shots. That's the same number of shots the infamous press video footage shows.
"And the audio sounds different from any other angle or footage I’ve seen of the event. This is either because: the kid making the Rumble video doctored it, or, the nefariously bad at recording cell phone used is tricking us sonically (I know a little about this, being a professional singer with many frustrating cell phone recordings under his belt lol)."
Any minor differences in sound can easily be explained by the difference in recording modes (mobile phone versus professional equipment used by media). But the fact remains the timing of the sound of the shots and Trump's reaction aligns perfectly between the two videos.
"It seems as if it is your opinion that this video shows the “truth”, which is counter to the current “narrative”. In my opinion, it shows the “narrative” is correct: some nut shot at Trump, aided and abetted by a corrupt, inept agency (probably several!) bogged down by DEI standards that supersede the physical standards you have repeatedly posted. I don’t know of your current consumption of American media, but the Secret Service is really getting grilled."
Of course the SS is getting grilled, it's all part of a time-honored script. This is the same old incompetence ruse, the old "mistakes were made" flimflammery that they've rolled out for every psy-op and cover up, be it Jimmy Saville or 9/11.
In fact, the official Jimmy Saville report, I kid you not, was actually titled "Mistakes Were Made":
Of course they're going to crap on a pre-ordained fall guy. They're certainly not going to admit, "okay, you got us, the whole thing was a sham!"
The "woke hiring standards" story doesn't wash. I have no doubt such standards are in play at DMV and child protection, but the extortionate class - of which Trump is clearly a member, I've presented evidence showing he takes orders from the pro-Israel lobby - takes their own protection very seriously. I've just expanded the article above to include the hiring requirements for SS agents. Firearm proficiency is a MUST and agents don't get assigned to protective detail until at least 3-5 years cutting their teeth in a field office.
"This whole situation smacks of Occam’s razor. The coordination and code of silence required by hundreds of individuals to pull this off seems impossible, and way too complicated to be pulled off by flawed, can’t keep their mouth shut about shite human beings."
The situation is easily explained by what you see: The bullets allegedly fired at Trump being popped off by a sniper in the opposite direction; no blood on his hand; the most pathetic attempt at mimicking a flinch response I've ever seen; clumsy chubsters who can't even holster a handgun masquerading as SS agents; these same highly-trained agents allowing the Don to stop for a fist-pumping photo op; the Trumpster wanking on about his shoes despite never getting shot in the foot, and on it goes.
It was the most pathetic piece of B-grade cinematography I've seen in quite some time, completely undone by the fact that Crooks evidently didn't adhere to the script, causing the security guy to shoot first. Trump, following his script, pretended to be shot and lowered his prodigious ass to the floor.
"But now I ask you: if you were an American citizen, who would you vote for? The pederastic, pants-shitting hair sniffer who enables his twisted son, or a business man with all the trappings and flaws and failings of many men in his situation/position? Or would you vote Kennedy? I’ve thought about voting for Kennedy."
My honest answer is none of them. When presented with a bucket of puke, a barrow of shit, or a mixture of the two, I firmly decline to indulge. The only presidential candidate I ever took a warming to was Ron Paul, and they made sure he didn't get anywhere near the Oval Office despite clearly being a hit with regular folks.
"I simply think the idea of him needing to fake this to help him win the election is erroneous. Between the horrible condition this country is in after 3.5 years of the current regime, and the aforementioned Kennedy “stealing” votes from Biden and the dems, a cock-a-mamie, complex fake shooting, needing flawless execution of timing and discretion amongst hundreds of individuals, is a bit of a stretch."
Why, when the evidence is right in front of your eyes? It's worked beautifully, look at the adulation the once-hated Trump is now basking in. You don't find it even a tad suspicious that it took the press and the Demos FOUR YEARS to acknowledge that Biden is a senile carcass that struggles to stay upright? You don't find it all curious that The President Who Divided America™ is now the guy uniting the nation?
"I look forward to a response, if you have time. Since this is my first engagement with you in the many years I’ve been following and reading you, I want to say thanks for your health and scientific literature contributions on fitness, nutrition, and obesity and other related conditions/diseases. Truly life changing! I regularly consult TFLB, and as I said before, I am looking forward to reading The Great Cholesterol Con, since I want to arm myself with the case you make, and flip the script on my doctors who are on me about my cholesterol numbers."
Thanks again for your support, and I'm glad my books have helped. And thanks again for posting sincere questions.
Anthony, a pleasure to engage and converse. Despite our disagreements, since 3/18/2020, ALL viewpoints, and ALL conspiracy “theories” (you have to put quotes on that word these days!) deserve consideration and scrutiny. So thank you for an alternate take.
I think you and I are seeing the same evidence, and coming to different conclusions. Still, your theories are a lot more sound than the numbskulls who think a professional shooter “only nicked” Trumps ear while simultaneously avoiding blowing his head off. Clearly they’ve never fired a gun!
“Then where are the initial shots, followed by the sniper shots? Where is the audio footage showing a volley of opened and returned fire? The video clearly shows the sniper firing off three shots. That's the same number of shots the infamous press video footage shows.”
The footage I’ve seen, I can hear 5 initial shots. As a point of curiosity, I read a report that forensic acoustic analyses has identified 3 unique sounds: Crooks rifle, the SS sniper’s rifle (that took out Crooks), and a 3rd weapon they know nothing about yet. I suspect you will say this is part of the same theater machine, but I’m curious to see if further investigation yields more insight.
I am ignorant of the Jimmy Saville story, I look forward to reading the link you posted.
“I've just expanded the article above to include the hiring requirements for SS agents. Firearm proficiency is a MUST and agents don't get assigned to protective detail until at least 3-5 years cutting their teeth in a field office.”
This seems to fall more into the evidence bucket of those of us who believe the assassination was real, and Trump was purposefully under protected. Crooks clearly had a handler/trainer (have you seen the footage closest to him, in which you see him on the roof, and an annoying woman keeps yelling at him to stop, using his name several times because she knew him, and he does a 100% had-to-be-trained “sniper roll” before beginning shooting? Also trickling in are reports of Crooks having several overseas bank accounts…you know, like you do when you’re 20!); he was practically escorted into position (again, a piece of evidence that could go either way), and the bumbling Bulge woman was just the most visible failure in a chain of horrendous decisions (again, many people believe the “conspiracy” that the team was untrained and under staffed on purpose).
“look at the adulation the once-hated Trump is now basking in. You don't find it even a tad suspicious that it took the press and the Demos FOUR YEARS to acknowledge that Biden is a senile carcass that struggles to stay upright? You don't find it all curious that The President Who Divided America™ is now the guy uniting the nation?”
This is several oversimplifications. 1st off, one could argue (and many are) that the appalling performance on debate night was the “cats out of the bag” reason to try and take Trump out, since the performance was so poor, even the most ardent Biden supporters (brain addled by several clot shots, no doubt) HAD to admit his carcass-like condition spelled doom for defeating Orange Man Bad™️
The right (or conservatives, se voi preferite) is uniting behind Trump, for sure. Perhaps even a few Democrats and/or Libs who can smash 2 brain cells together. But the left? He’s still extremely hated (take a quick gander through X or FB or Instagram to see people wishing the shooter didn’t miss, had more training, etc.). We’ll find out in November if he’s truly uniting the nation! And the media and dems/progressives (but I repeat myself) denying Biden’s dementia and incompetence for 4 years is so par for the course, it may as well be some kind of drinking game. So no, I wasn’t surprised at their “shock”, nor was anyone else paying half attention.
Once again, I’m flattered by the conversing, and I wish you a good day.
Hey Brian, I'll address the rest of your points shortly, but in the meantime -
"The footage I’ve seen, I can hear 5 initial shots. As a point of curiosity, I read a report that forensic acoustic analyses has identified 3 unique sounds: Crooks rifle, the SS sniper’s rifle (that took out Crooks), and a 3rd weapon they know nothing about yet. "
Can you link to this footage showing 5 initial shots? And the 'report' that now seems to be acknowledging multiple shooters?
In the days following, I was, like many others, “addicted” to media. I saw so many things in the blur and buzz of it all, it was hard to remember where I had seen/heard things. But a quick search found me these 2 articles. They are not smoking guns by any means.
As to the footage, I am referring to the universal view from the front, aired by all media. I thought I heard 5 shots, and the initial media reports all claimed 5 shots, but it’s possible I and they were mistaken (could be the “crack and pop” effect this article mentions, due to the physics of supersonic projectiles; it was only 3 shots, but sounded like more).
What if Crooks was made up? Just another lame part of their psyop. Peggy Hall does a great 40+ minute video on here that y’all should check out, if you haven’t already. Lots of great questions and they certainly get you thinking even more!
And you still posting weak, ineffectual comments that don't even begin to refute any of the discrepancies I and others have pointed out.
A true intellectual powerhouse you are Sam, we all stand in awe of your ability to say absolutely nothing of substance and even follow it with an emoji!
You post four videos and none even begin to explain the case of the mystery U-turn bullets. None even begin to explain how Trump could possibly be hit by 3 bullets being fired AWAY from him, as documented on video here:
Here's a much better video, that delivers more plain truth in a minute than your collective 30 minutes or so of rambling, question-avoiding videos could ever hope to:
lol did you even watch the videos? It tracks the bullets. Far better than rambling reaches over the shooting footage. The footage isn’t clear enough to be conclusive that he had no blood on his hands. What’s your credentials? Any military, weapon or bullet forensic experience?
No, they all indulge in make believe. Like you, they shove their heads up their assholes and refuse to acknowledge the video showing those 3 infamous shots were in fact being fired in the opposite direction.
My credentials are that I have a functioning brain and two good eyes - a combination that allows me to identify footage showing the infamous three shots being fired AWAY from Trump AND to know his RHS flapper could not possibly have been hit by bullets traveling in the opposite direction.
What are your credentials? Let me guess: Gullibility, cognitive dissonance, believing whatever the media tells you, and a complete inability to think for yourself.
To recap: You've been presented with footage clearly showing:
1) the three shots, one of which allegedly hit Trump's ear, were being fired AWAY from him;
2) Trump blatantly lying about the blood all over his hands.
The only blood this prick has on his hands is all the people who died from his beloved kill shots.
The real golden turds: The people on the street who still think DJT was actually shot and that the chances of an ear graze are one in ten per shot. Yup, Common Core education gives rise to peanut butter brains.
In my article, “The Three Ways to Decode Information,” I introduce the concept of the ‘official conspiracy narrative’-a narrative designed for those who are skeptical of the mainstream. This narrative, I argue, is a powerful tool that, while seemingly challenging the official narrative, ultimately serves to reinforce it and control the viewer’s perception.
Example:
1) Official Narrative: “Someone was shooting at Trump”
2) Official Conspiracy Narrative: “How did the secret service let someone shoot at Trump?”
3)Unorthodoxy Narrative: “The shooting wasn’t real — the blood is fake. Don’t trust what you see on the television.”
Notice how the first two support the narrative of “shooting” — this is what reality is built on, but the truth is the “shooting” never occurred.
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/false-flags-and-fake-false-flags
Yes, we always get a controlled opp (2) alongside a psyop (1), the Market vs Lab for the make-believe virus.
As people grow wise to fakery there comes a narrative between 2 and 3 that says the event was staged but that somehow real bullets were used, there were real casualties nonetheless, ultimately bringing us back to narrative 2.
Thanks for this Alex. In my article, "3 Ways To Decode Official Narratives," I use the case study of 9/11 for example. The official narrative and conspiracy state that airplanes flew into the tower but the unorthodox narrative is that bombs blew the buildings up. In that scenario, the casualties are real outside of the first two narratives. Let me know your thoughts.
Here are two articles: 1st of the 3 narratives and 2nd of deep fake technology and 9/11:
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/3-key-methods-to-decode-official
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-to-tell-whats-real-in-the-land
I think your “unorthodox” narrative for 9/11 corresponds to what I call the intermediate narrative: it’s still not calling the attack itself a fake. In both narratives it was a real attack whether by bombs or planes.
Information Operations (psyops) are broken down along these lines, knowing that an official story won't capture everyone, therefore a controlled counter narrative is critical, along with rabbit hole narratives to capture the perpetual rabbit hole seekers.
This event has psyops written all over it. You've made a very astute set of observations in my opinion.
1000% agree! Agree 1000% — truly an information psyop
“Information is the conductor of realities- brining present to future.” Whoever yields it posses great power
It's truly exasperating. Even when you show them the footage of the three infamous shots being fired AWAY from Trump, they still refuse to accept reality that this was all a charade!
These people are vociferously defending the same parasites who hold them in sheer contempt, who unleashed toxic gene therapies in a deliberate mission to kill them and their children.
People get the leadership they deserve and all that...
The other thing that stuns me about Trump is that so-called 'Christians' and 'conservatives' adore him. There is so much readily accessible information online, straight from the guy's own mouth, showing he is a lowlife sleazeball.
He's repeatedly made inappropriate comments about his own daughter Ivanka, chuckled along while Howard Stern called her a "piece of ass," publicly derided his ex-wife Marla as "nice tits, no brains" (because we all know how much Trump values high IQ in a partner), boasted about grabbing women by the "pussy"...
If your daughter brought home a grub like Trump, you'd drag him out the back, give him a good belting, and send him packing with a stern warning never to come near her again.
I guess conservative values ain't what they used to be...
You and me Both! I wrote this article in response to that: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-right-propaganda-is-still-propaganda
Like these guys are so good at calling out propaganda but can’t see THIS propaganda in their face.
It's not that complicated ... but oh my goodness. I have a friend who just automatically goes for the 2nd-level propaganda. You can't talk him out of it ... and those in power have us profiled and know that this % will go for this narrative and that % will go for that one, etc.
Psyop of the hoax variety indeed. Good look at yet another glaring bit that shows it was a production to cast sandy hooks into Our emotions and drag Us where They want Us!
Unfortunately I know a lot of people who could use that discount code 🙄
Now now, Anthony ... this one's scarcely worth your posting.
Btw: a blogging 'friend' of mine disagreed when I told her it was all bullshit; I was really disappointed when she said in somewhat grandiose manner "I know what I saw". In today's world ???
Quite sad, innit? Critical thinking is a vanishing art, Methinks.
I can't get over so ... so ... banal ? a statement, in a world wherein almost nothing can be taken at face value any more.
I agree that nothing can be taken at face value. Perhaps it is because I saw that prior to 9/11, and knew that show was not what They purported it to be when it happened, and so am used to it, that My comments come off as...banal...
Twenty-three+ years of watching play after play and seeing the stage and actors trying to convince Us that what They perform is "reality" - and with the addition of the wag-the-dog element in so much They present - it allows for adjustment.
What a Play! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/what-a-play
The laughs were well worth the posting.
I stand corrected !! :D
Love your handle: reminds me of one of my favourite movies - "Get Shorty" ...
Does Barbie have her weapon pointed at Trump fans in front of her, between her attempts to holster her gun?? I ask because I can’t see her dark weapon against her dark jacket very well in the video, but once or twice it seems her finger on the gun is at nearly a 90° angle from her body. (Close enough to it to hit a person in front of her.)
FFS You never point a gun at someone you don’t intend to shoot, even if you are sure it’s not loaded, (I’m wondering if hers was unloaded so she couldn’t accidentally shoot her own handlers), even if you’re well-disciplined about keeping your trigger finger along the side of the weapon. A true SS agent would know that (as well as be able to holster her weapon).
Maybe I’m wrong and it was always pointed to the ground, and not directly at the crowd in front of her.
I'm not trying to prove anything here about the (staged or real) assassination attempt, but the video footage of the obviously inept agent only proves that the Secret Service has become, like just about any other organization in the USA, a victim of the DEI doctrine. Kimberly Cheattle, the current director, once stated that she needed to "attract diverse candidates and give opportunities to everybody in the workforce, particularly women." She said she aims to have 30% women in the agency by 2030. As you very well know, any policy that puts group membership above qualifications is destined to result in pearls like Secret Service Agent Barbie. But it doesn't prove anything about a hoax.
To qualify for the role of secret service agent, one must:
"Be in excellent health and physical condition and pass an Applicant Physical Abilities Test."
https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/special-agent/qualifications
"Secret Service agents receive continuous advanced training throughout their careers. In part, this training consists of regular firearms requalification and emergency medicine refresher courses."
https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/special-agent/training
However woke we're supposed to believe the SS will be by 2030, there is no way a chubby, fumbling clown who clearly is unfamiliar with a firearm passed the rigorous requirements for becoming an SS agent. She is an actress. A poor one. Just like Trump.
I tend to think she's just a deliberate Revelation of the Method figure rubbing it in our faces. They always have to let us know.
I'd imagine that "real" security was in operation.
It just hit me. The name “Kimberly Cheatle” is a reference to “Rooftop Koreans” via a pun on kimchi, the most famous Korean food.
Oh jesus h. christ ! - women in powerful positions ...
I agree that the purported assassination attempt was theater. A related observation is that the photograph purportedly showing the bullet is an obvious fraud. I present evidence of that fraud here: https://peteryim.substack.com/p/the-magic-bullet
There are always multiple theories to what we perceive. You see an actor. I see an incompetent DEI hire. My perspective makes much more sense to me than yours does.
To qualify for the role of secret service agent, one must:
"Be in excellent health and physical condition and pass an Applicant Physical Abilities Test."
https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/special-agent/qualifications
"Secret Service agents receive continuous advanced training throughout their careers. In part, this training consists of regular firearms requalification and emergency medicine refresher courses."
https://www.secretservice.gov/careers/special-agent/training
You believe a chubby, fumbling clown who clearly is unfamiliar with a firearm passed the rigorous requirements for becoming an SS agent?
Sure thing.
I submit the entire charade was a pre-orchestrated hoax, and have presented the evidence to prove it.
I guess you think one of the three gunshots captured on video being fired AWAY from Trump decided to do a U-turn and clip his ear.
My perspective makes much more sense than yours does.
Look at the head of the SS. She is in worse shape than the "officer". That is the whole thing with DEI... they bend the rules to let any piece of shit in to any position they want. Look who is naive now. Next you will be telling me the Earth is flat because NASA sux.
Greg, stop trying to divert the conversation off to Flat Earth theory, that places you in the same sad camp as Robert Malone, which is not good.
"Look at the head of the SS. She is in worse shape than the "officer". "
Right. Because she is NOT an SS officer, she is a crisis actor.
"That is the whole thing with DEI... they bend the rules to let any piece of shit in to any position they want."
The parasite class take their self-preservation seriously. You won't accept it, but Trump is part of that parasite class. Rules are NOT broken when it comes to protecting themselves.
But if you disagree, go ahead. Find some fat clumsy goof and get them to a position where they are defending presidential candidates. Document the entire process on camera, it'll be a hit documentary for sure.
WTF? TRUMP IS A zIONIST PIECE OF SHIT. But that does not prove the crisis actor BS. You take ignorant leaps to unfounded conclusions. Nothing I said should have made a critical thinker believe I think Trump is a "good guy".
Settle Greg, otherwise someone might thing you're getting a wee bit triggered.
"But that does not prove the crisis actor BS."
But the numerous discrepancies I've pointed out do.
As does the fact you can't factually refute them but instead start wanking on about Flat Earth Theory lol
Boy you are easily distracted. And yet, you do not acknowledge that I am not a Trump lover like you claimed. Have fun with your little suppositions. I have better ways to spend my time. Cheers! BTW, Most of your other positions are admirable. No one is right 100% of the time.
Looking at the fact that Biden and members of his team appear to have received the real covid vaccine, based on their health outcomes, I have to seriously doubt that they are part of the protected class you are talking about.
It seems to me that they are seen as expendable pawns, and in which case, yes the SS might have been corrupted intentionally.
Politicians with no military experience are unlikely to know much about the level of preparedness that these agents should have. Just as many civilians have strange Hollywood fuelled delusions about military training and activity.
We know that globalists want to weaken nation states and pit them against eachother in a cynical divide and conquer strategy.
It would make a lot of sense to fail to kill him as well as actually kill him. So what need is there to fake the shooting when a real shooting works just as well?
I'm open to the possibility that it was staged, but I wouldn't base that belief on the idea that these politicians have any idea what they are doing at all. I think they are clowns.
You really do seem to have gathered a cult of sychphants on the channel. 7 years of the FBI, DOJ and HS trying to destroy the President with lawfare that's falling apart and bringing millions to our MAGA party while Oats for Brains retreats to his basement again while jeffries, obama and the wife of the gay Californian drunk work out what to do with him, and you think they're going to turn on a dime and say "He's our man".
Let's murder one of his supporters to make the President a man of compassion and attract so much attention that he wins 48 states (nobody wants California or Oregan anymore).
Hey. If that's what's happening I'll take it.
The President and JD will be so busy breathing life back into a dead country that they won't be worried about you.
No. Steve Bannon, Kash Patel, Peter Navarro, Dan Bongino, James O'Keefe, Tom Fitton, et al, theyre the ones coming after you...they are the President's wing men.
"You really do seem to have gathered a cult of sychphants on the channel." (sic)
No, it's just that my readership is no doubt smarter than you and yours.
Now, Ernie the Coward, would you like to take time out from your incoherent ranting, and thinly veiled threats issued from behind the safety of your computer screen, to explain the glaring discrepancies, documented on video, that show this was a pre-orchestrated hoax?
You can start by explaining how at least one of the three shots caught on camera being fired AWAY from Trump allegedly did a U-turn and clipped him in the ear?
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/heres-the-footage-that-blows-the
Your time starts now...
It seems that I was coherent enough to get you to reply. And the threats? The President won't have time for your petty quables. The glaring discrepancies? I've already watched a ton of footage showing different angles from different sources..what makes yours any different. I've seen the videos analysed by people who back the President and those that don't. So you're saying that the people who have spent seven years turning the country into your Marxist paradise of chaos and destruction suddenly turned and said Trump is our man, we'll knock his ear at a rally.
Your readership? I've seen no one opposed you. That's not leadership that's a cult.
A coward? I'm taking you on... behind the computer or not...at 74 I've spent my life opposing shit heads, no reason to stop now.
There is the thought that the shooters first thought was to kill as many in the crowd because although he bought a ladder he didn't use it...he was going to fire from ground level. But your security agencies seemed to want to give him a shot at the King and he took it. He missed. That's why the woman leading the SS was shitting bricks. The plan was to kill the President, investigate the assassination in the same way they investigated the Kennedy assassination (wait 100 years for the truth) and return America to "Normal"
"It seems that I was coherent enough to get you to reply."
No, you were so ridiculously irrational that I felt obliged to reply on compassionate grounds.
"And the threats? The President won't have time for your petty quables." (sic)
Of course he doesn't, he's too busy playing out his role as Zionist bitch boy.
As for your warning that Bannon et al are coming after me, why don't you all come meet me face to face? Without security, just your brave manly selves. You'll need to sign an agreement beforehand acknowledging that the incident may result in physical harm to yourselves resulting from threatening overtones made by Ernie the Boxhead.
Out of curiosity, do you even have permission to speak on their behalves? Or are you just a pathetic little coward trying on the "I'll get my daddy to beat you up" ruse?
"A coward? I'm taking you on... behind the computer or not...at 74 I've spent my life opposing shit heads, no reason to stop now."
I hate to break this to you, Ernie, but you're one of the shitheads. You support a lying sexual deviant.
"There is the thought that the shooters first thought was to kill as many in the crowd because although he bought a ladder he didn't use it...he was going to fire from ground level. But your security agencies seemed to want to give him a shot at the King and he took it. He missed. "
There is the thought you you are suffering incurable cognitive dissonance, and its a compelling one. Once more you have completely failed to explain how THE THREE SHOTS TELEVISED AROUND THE WORLD, COULD POSSIBLY HAVE HIT TRUMP'S EAR WHEN THERE IS VIDEO FOOTAGE SHOWING THEM BEING FIRED AWAY FROM HIM?
Don't normally shout, but I've already asked you this several times and you keep failing to give a coherent answer.
Ernie Boxhead? Either your eyesight or your spellcheck is out of kilter. But then you do seem to have a somewhat irrational temper.
Says the angry guy who warns that people he doesn't know are coming after me.
Hate to break this to you Ernie, but you're a loon.
I've told you. Where do you get three shots from? At least eight were heard.
Ernie, why are you even arguing with me when you haven't even watched the footage of the 'assassination attempt'? Do you always argue with people on matters you know nothing about?
I'll make this easy for you, in simple to follow steps:
1. Go to this page:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/heres-the-footage-that-blows-the
2. Watch the second video first, it's the one televised around the world. You hear the first three shots. Trump pretends to be shot on the second one. There is a brief pause, then more shots are fired. By that point, Trump is on the ground covered in B-grade actors.
3. Watch the first video, which shows the first three shots did not come from an alleged assassin, but from the nearby security gunman who can clearly be seen firing AWAY from Trump.
4. Provide me with evidence that that rooftop security guy was using bullets capable of reversing direction in mid-air.
I can show you a host of videos dozens of them from all angles and you're asking me to watch one that you, a conspiracy theorist has either chosen or altered? I watch Dan Bongino's extensive interviews (I believe he knows 10x times more than you about SS security...At no time does Dan talk about a dancing bullet.
I'll take the word of a man who was lead in the protection of Clinton, Bush and Obama over you every day of the week.
Or is Dan in on the conspiracy?
Two people died, another two seriously injured. Not a credible hoax, don’t let your opinion of trump cloud your judgement, only discredit yourself.
SS personnel performance shows where quotas will take us.
"Two people died, another two seriously injured. Not a credible hoax, don’t let your opinion of trump cloud your judgement, only discredit yourself."
Who says it's not a credible hoax? Psy-ops almost always feature 'collateral damage' - see Port Arthur Massacre, 9/11, USS Liberty bombing, Columbine shooting for some especially fatal examples.
Not to mention 'COVID' and Operation Warp Speed, which your boy Trump proudly put his signature to.
If innocent people were killed and injured, it was probably from the several shots fired AFTER Trump was already on the ground and smothered by B-grade actors.
We know the first three shots, which were the cue for Trump to launch into his pathetic flinch response impersonation, came from the security sniper on the nearby roof who was firing AWAY from Trump. That is now well documented, as explained here:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/heres-the-footage-that-blows-the
But don't let what you can plainly see with your own eyes cloud your judgement, gotta keep drinking that left vs right Kool Aid no matter what, right?
Comments like yours show where years of dedicated dumbing down and indoctrination disguised as education will take us.
Hi Anthony,
Big fan here (and of your friends Richard Nikoley, and Matt Stone). Proud owner of The Fat Loss Bible, and soon to be proud owner of The Great Cholesterol Con.
The video you offer as evidence of falseness: it looks to me like the SS agent on the roof is reacting to Crook’s first shots, not firing the gun himself. And the audio sounds different from any other angle or footage I’ve seen of the event. This is either because: the kid making the Rumble video doctored it, or, the nefariously bad at recording cell phone used is tricking us sonically (I know a little about this, being a professional singer with many frustrating cell phone recordings under his belt lol).
It seems as if it is your opinion that this video shows the “truth”, which is counter to the current “narrative”. In my opinion, it shows the “narrative” is correct: some nut shot at Trump, aided and abetted by a corrupt, inept agency (probably several!) bogged down by DEI standards that supersede the physical standards you have repeatedly posted. I don’t know of your current consumption of American media, but the Secret Service is really getting grilled.
This whole situation smacks of Occam’s razor. The coordination and code of silence required by hundreds of individuals to pull this off seems impossible, and way too complicated to be pulled off by flawed, can’t keep their mouth shut about shite human beings.
For the record, Trump is all the things you say. I like him, I admire him, but I’m pissed at him for Operation warp speed, and not correcting his stance on the vax despite overwhelming evidence he was wrong (also a few other things in his presidency people have forgotten). But now I ask you: if you were an American citizen, who would you vote for? The pederastic, pants-shitting hair sniffer who enables his twisted son, or a business man with all the trappings and flaws and failings of many men in his situation/position? Or would you vote Kennedy? I’ve thought about voting for Kennedy.
I simply think the idea of him needing to fake this to help him win the election is erroneous. Between the horrible condition this country is in after 3.5 years of the current regime, and the aforementioned Kennedy “stealing” votes from Biden and the dems, a cock-a-mamie, complex fake shooting, needing flawless execution of timing and discretion amongst hundreds of individuals, is a bit of a stretch.
I look forward to a response, if you have time. Since this is my first engagement with you in the many years I’ve been following and reading you, I want to say thanks for your health and scientific literature contributions on fitness, nutrition, and obesity and other related conditions/diseases. Truly life changing! I regularly consult TFLB, and as I said before, I am looking forward to reading The Great Cholesterol Con, since I want to arm myself with the case you make, and flip the script on my doctors who are on me about my cholesterol numbers.
Sincerely,
Brian Landry
Hi Brian,
thanks for your support, and thanks for posting a conflicting opinion that isn't replete with profanity, insults and threats (big shout out to Merrick and Ernie!)
"The video you offer as evidence of falseness: it looks to me like the SS agent on the roof is reacting to Crook’s first shots, not firing the gun himself."
Then where are the initial shots, followed by the sniper shots? Where is the audio footage showing a volley of opened and returned fire? The video clearly shows the sniper firing off three shots. That's the same number of shots the infamous press video footage shows.
"And the audio sounds different from any other angle or footage I’ve seen of the event. This is either because: the kid making the Rumble video doctored it, or, the nefariously bad at recording cell phone used is tricking us sonically (I know a little about this, being a professional singer with many frustrating cell phone recordings under his belt lol)."
Any minor differences in sound can easily be explained by the difference in recording modes (mobile phone versus professional equipment used by media). But the fact remains the timing of the sound of the shots and Trump's reaction aligns perfectly between the two videos.
"It seems as if it is your opinion that this video shows the “truth”, which is counter to the current “narrative”. In my opinion, it shows the “narrative” is correct: some nut shot at Trump, aided and abetted by a corrupt, inept agency (probably several!) bogged down by DEI standards that supersede the physical standards you have repeatedly posted. I don’t know of your current consumption of American media, but the Secret Service is really getting grilled."
Of course the SS is getting grilled, it's all part of a time-honored script. This is the same old incompetence ruse, the old "mistakes were made" flimflammery that they've rolled out for every psy-op and cover up, be it Jimmy Saville or 9/11.
In fact, the official Jimmy Saville report, I kid you not, was actually titled "Mistakes Were Made":
https://assets-hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/uploads/review-into-allegations-and-intelligence-material-concerning-jimmy-savile.pdf
Of course they're going to crap on a pre-ordained fall guy. They're certainly not going to admit, "okay, you got us, the whole thing was a sham!"
The "woke hiring standards" story doesn't wash. I have no doubt such standards are in play at DMV and child protection, but the extortionate class - of which Trump is clearly a member, I've presented evidence showing he takes orders from the pro-Israel lobby - takes their own protection very seriously. I've just expanded the article above to include the hiring requirements for SS agents. Firearm proficiency is a MUST and agents don't get assigned to protective detail until at least 3-5 years cutting their teeth in a field office.
"This whole situation smacks of Occam’s razor. The coordination and code of silence required by hundreds of individuals to pull this off seems impossible, and way too complicated to be pulled off by flawed, can’t keep their mouth shut about shite human beings."
The situation is easily explained by what you see: The bullets allegedly fired at Trump being popped off by a sniper in the opposite direction; no blood on his hand; the most pathetic attempt at mimicking a flinch response I've ever seen; clumsy chubsters who can't even holster a handgun masquerading as SS agents; these same highly-trained agents allowing the Don to stop for a fist-pumping photo op; the Trumpster wanking on about his shoes despite never getting shot in the foot, and on it goes.
It was the most pathetic piece of B-grade cinematography I've seen in quite some time, completely undone by the fact that Crooks evidently didn't adhere to the script, causing the security guy to shoot first. Trump, following his script, pretended to be shot and lowered his prodigious ass to the floor.
"But now I ask you: if you were an American citizen, who would you vote for? The pederastic, pants-shitting hair sniffer who enables his twisted son, or a business man with all the trappings and flaws and failings of many men in his situation/position? Or would you vote Kennedy? I’ve thought about voting for Kennedy."
My honest answer is none of them. When presented with a bucket of puke, a barrow of shit, or a mixture of the two, I firmly decline to indulge. The only presidential candidate I ever took a warming to was Ron Paul, and they made sure he didn't get anywhere near the Oval Office despite clearly being a hit with regular folks.
"I simply think the idea of him needing to fake this to help him win the election is erroneous. Between the horrible condition this country is in after 3.5 years of the current regime, and the aforementioned Kennedy “stealing” votes from Biden and the dems, a cock-a-mamie, complex fake shooting, needing flawless execution of timing and discretion amongst hundreds of individuals, is a bit of a stretch."
Why, when the evidence is right in front of your eyes? It's worked beautifully, look at the adulation the once-hated Trump is now basking in. You don't find it even a tad suspicious that it took the press and the Demos FOUR YEARS to acknowledge that Biden is a senile carcass that struggles to stay upright? You don't find it all curious that The President Who Divided America™ is now the guy uniting the nation?
"I look forward to a response, if you have time. Since this is my first engagement with you in the many years I’ve been following and reading you, I want to say thanks for your health and scientific literature contributions on fitness, nutrition, and obesity and other related conditions/diseases. Truly life changing! I regularly consult TFLB, and as I said before, I am looking forward to reading The Great Cholesterol Con, since I want to arm myself with the case you make, and flip the script on my doctors who are on me about my cholesterol numbers."
Thanks again for your support, and I'm glad my books have helped. And thanks again for posting sincere questions.
Cheers,
Anthony.
Anthony, a pleasure to engage and converse. Despite our disagreements, since 3/18/2020, ALL viewpoints, and ALL conspiracy “theories” (you have to put quotes on that word these days!) deserve consideration and scrutiny. So thank you for an alternate take.
I think you and I are seeing the same evidence, and coming to different conclusions. Still, your theories are a lot more sound than the numbskulls who think a professional shooter “only nicked” Trumps ear while simultaneously avoiding blowing his head off. Clearly they’ve never fired a gun!
“Then where are the initial shots, followed by the sniper shots? Where is the audio footage showing a volley of opened and returned fire? The video clearly shows the sniper firing off three shots. That's the same number of shots the infamous press video footage shows.”
The footage I’ve seen, I can hear 5 initial shots. As a point of curiosity, I read a report that forensic acoustic analyses has identified 3 unique sounds: Crooks rifle, the SS sniper’s rifle (that took out Crooks), and a 3rd weapon they know nothing about yet. I suspect you will say this is part of the same theater machine, but I’m curious to see if further investigation yields more insight.
I am ignorant of the Jimmy Saville story, I look forward to reading the link you posted.
“I've just expanded the article above to include the hiring requirements for SS agents. Firearm proficiency is a MUST and agents don't get assigned to protective detail until at least 3-5 years cutting their teeth in a field office.”
This seems to fall more into the evidence bucket of those of us who believe the assassination was real, and Trump was purposefully under protected. Crooks clearly had a handler/trainer (have you seen the footage closest to him, in which you see him on the roof, and an annoying woman keeps yelling at him to stop, using his name several times because she knew him, and he does a 100% had-to-be-trained “sniper roll” before beginning shooting? Also trickling in are reports of Crooks having several overseas bank accounts…you know, like you do when you’re 20!); he was practically escorted into position (again, a piece of evidence that could go either way), and the bumbling Bulge woman was just the most visible failure in a chain of horrendous decisions (again, many people believe the “conspiracy” that the team was untrained and under staffed on purpose).
“look at the adulation the once-hated Trump is now basking in. You don't find it even a tad suspicious that it took the press and the Demos FOUR YEARS to acknowledge that Biden is a senile carcass that struggles to stay upright? You don't find it all curious that The President Who Divided America™ is now the guy uniting the nation?”
This is several oversimplifications. 1st off, one could argue (and many are) that the appalling performance on debate night was the “cats out of the bag” reason to try and take Trump out, since the performance was so poor, even the most ardent Biden supporters (brain addled by several clot shots, no doubt) HAD to admit his carcass-like condition spelled doom for defeating Orange Man Bad™️
The right (or conservatives, se voi preferite) is uniting behind Trump, for sure. Perhaps even a few Democrats and/or Libs who can smash 2 brain cells together. But the left? He’s still extremely hated (take a quick gander through X or FB or Instagram to see people wishing the shooter didn’t miss, had more training, etc.). We’ll find out in November if he’s truly uniting the nation! And the media and dems/progressives (but I repeat myself) denying Biden’s dementia and incompetence for 4 years is so par for the course, it may as well be some kind of drinking game. So no, I wasn’t surprised at their “shock”, nor was anyone else paying half attention.
Once again, I’m flattered by the conversing, and I wish you a good day.
Best,
Brian
Hey Brian, I'll address the rest of your points shortly, but in the meantime -
"The footage I’ve seen, I can hear 5 initial shots. As a point of curiosity, I read a report that forensic acoustic analyses has identified 3 unique sounds: Crooks rifle, the SS sniper’s rifle (that took out Crooks), and a 3rd weapon they know nothing about yet. "
Can you link to this footage showing 5 initial shots? And the 'report' that now seems to be acknowledging multiple shooters?
Hi Anthony,
So sorry for the delay…I’m afraid I’m not as Substack savvy as I ought to be!
All I could find: https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-rally-shooting-07-14-24#h_e3b77ce122987eb5d2059a2dff21a270
And the article that led me to the CNN article:
https://asiatimes.com/2024/07/was-there-a-second-shooter-new-acoustic-evidence/
In the days following, I was, like many others, “addicted” to media. I saw so many things in the blur and buzz of it all, it was hard to remember where I had seen/heard things. But a quick search found me these 2 articles. They are not smoking guns by any means.
As to the footage, I am referring to the universal view from the front, aired by all media. I thought I heard 5 shots, and the initial media reports all claimed 5 shots, but it’s possible I and they were mistaken (could be the “crack and pop” effect this article mentions, due to the physics of supersonic projectiles; it was only 3 shots, but sounded like more).
Thanks again for your patience. Cheers!
Brian
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't there restricted airspace during these events? I clearly saw what looked like a Cesna fly over.
Here is another perspective: https://georgewebb.substack.com/p/walking-the-trump-gunmans-metadata?publication_id=674856&post_id=146910785&isFreemail=true&r=u4qm
What if Crooks was made up? Just another lame part of their psyop. Peggy Hall does a great 40+ minute video on here that y’all should check out, if you haven’t already. Lots of great questions and they certainly get you thinking even more!
You still going on with the crap 🤦🏻♂️
And you still posting weak, ineffectual comments that don't even begin to refute any of the discrepancies I and others have pointed out.
A true intellectual powerhouse you are Sam, we all stand in awe of your ability to say absolutely nothing of substance and even follow it with an emoji!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FsvJzfXZI18&pp=ygUTVHJ1bXAgYXNzYXNzaW5hdGlvbg%3D%3D
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtJA9xuzAFE&pp=ygUTVHJ1bXAgYXNzYXNzaW5hdGlvbg%3D%3D
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X7NRXLQLehM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-w2lVIJc000
Still going on with the crap is Sam.
You post four videos and none even begin to explain the case of the mystery U-turn bullets. None even begin to explain how Trump could possibly be hit by 3 bullets being fired AWAY from him, as documented on video here:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/heres-the-footage-that-blows-the
Here's a much better video, that delivers more plain truth in a minute than your collective 30 minutes or so of rambling, question-avoiding videos could ever hope to:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Gb04gJh4N0bl
Trump is a LIAR and he's got you fooled, sucker.
Don’t get me wrong that there is definitely some shady shit going on but shooting wasn’t fake!
lol did you even watch the videos? It tracks the bullets. Far better than rambling reaches over the shooting footage. The footage isn’t clear enough to be conclusive that he had no blood on his hands. What’s your credentials? Any military, weapon or bullet forensic experience?
"It tracks the bullets."
No, they all indulge in make believe. Like you, they shove their heads up their assholes and refuse to acknowledge the video showing those 3 infamous shots were in fact being fired in the opposite direction.
My credentials are that I have a functioning brain and two good eyes - a combination that allows me to identify footage showing the infamous three shots being fired AWAY from Trump AND to know his RHS flapper could not possibly have been hit by bullets traveling in the opposite direction.
What are your credentials? Let me guess: Gullibility, cognitive dissonance, believing whatever the media tells you, and a complete inability to think for yourself.
To recap: You've been presented with footage clearly showing:
1) the three shots, one of which allegedly hit Trump's ear, were being fired AWAY from him;
2) Trump blatantly lying about the blood all over his hands.
The only blood this prick has on his hands is all the people who died from his beloved kill shots.
Next...