Poynter and Politifact are businesses for a made up concept. Look at how long they have been in existence, who owns them and thank you for specifying who their biggest investors are.
It's a perfect example of creating a market that wasn't needed, for a product that didn't exist. When that happens, it's usually for shuffling money around or narrative control. In this case, both.
"Factcheckers" was never a thing prior to 2019. *However did the world survive before them?😐🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
*sarcasm implied for those that may have missed it
Yes your completely accurate in your Wikipediaesque assessment.
You may have missed the point I was referring to though being that- kowtowing to "factchecked", self appointed (yet strangely governmental approved) groups of private enterprise individuals, who dictate to the public, what denotes "fact", was never a globally accepted practice before 2019.😐 Certainly not outside of Academia, and not without pushback.
In 2019, suddenly everything changed and Factcheckers became the new "RCT, gold standard of information". They even gave each other pretty awards for "best factchecker".🤡🤦♀️
Btw, those businesses actually started prior to 2003, that's just the "official version". Go look at the DoD programmes between 1996- 2004. You should see the connections😉🤗
There is no clear research proving the existence of HPV (1), evidence of abnormal chromosomes to be caused by the never-found HPV virus, and thus the the validity of the test.
(1) Hausen. A Papilloma DNA from a cervical cancer and its prevalence from cancer biopsy samples from different geographic regions. Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences, June 1983.
-No Virus particle was purified-isolated
-The origin of the DNA was not known
-Hybridization got < 0.1% match and was arbitrarily declared to be a new type.
nice job. Anthony. But aren't you preaching to the choir? Aluminum is not an "adjuvant", its a nuclear explosion in the body. Dead bugs and virii are inert, but novel.- pair their entry with Al, the most electro-positive ion )after fluoride)...and its that trauma that trains the body to be ever vigilant when it next encounters virtually anything else that entered at the same time (i.e. milk, egg, peanut proteins). When I was a kid we did not have peanut anaphylactic events. Now kids are deathly allergic to eggs, milk etc. Quite a deviously brilliant long-term end-game. Then they sell us Epi-Pens. (Don't get mad, get even...MB works better, is dirt cheap). And what's the deal with "Turbo-Cancers", WTF! The Establishment is unravelling. Can't trust anyone, 'cept one's own chops.
you never know IF these infants even existed... i would not be surprised if these "studies" are total fakes like hte viruses and vaccines. so no participants and no infants
It takes 3 whole minutes to find out ‘factchecker’ organizations are funded by hundred millionaires to billionaires, every time. Therein lies the lies. Why every person on the planet can’t figure that out remains their only hope, and next victims.
Sasha Latypova, Dr. Judy Makovits and Katherine Watt(i believe) wrote on the “Fact Checkers “ and Judy wrote extensively on pathetic - Peer Reviewed journals bias and collusion.
"FDA regulations require safety testing of constituent ingredients in drugs (21 CFR 610.15). With the exception of extraneous proteins, no component safety testing is required for vaccines or vaccine schedules. The dosing of aluminum in vaccines is based on the production of antibody titers, not safety science"
It would also be correct to say:
"There’s never been an INERT-placebo-controlled study on childhood vaccines. Not one."
See: https://icandecide.org/vaccine-safety-debate/
Ok, because saline isn't inert.
PolitiFact has the perfect name. All of their 'facts' are political propaganda.
Poynter and Politifact are businesses for a made up concept. Look at how long they have been in existence, who owns them and thank you for specifying who their biggest investors are.
It's a perfect example of creating a market that wasn't needed, for a product that didn't exist. When that happens, it's usually for shuffling money around or narrative control. In this case, both.
"Factcheckers" was never a thing prior to 2019. *However did the world survive before them?😐🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
*sarcasm implied for those that may have missed it
""Factcheckers" was never a thing prior to 2019." - Actually, Politifact was established in 2007, and FactCheck.org in 2003.
😐😐🤦♀️ *sigh*
Yes your completely accurate in your Wikipediaesque assessment.
You may have missed the point I was referring to though being that- kowtowing to "factchecked", self appointed (yet strangely governmental approved) groups of private enterprise individuals, who dictate to the public, what denotes "fact", was never a globally accepted practice before 2019.😐 Certainly not outside of Academia, and not without pushback.
In 2019, suddenly everything changed and Factcheckers became the new "RCT, gold standard of information". They even gave each other pretty awards for "best factchecker".🤡🤦♀️
Btw, those businesses actually started prior to 2003, that's just the "official version". Go look at the DoD programmes between 1996- 2004. You should see the connections😉🤗
There is no clear research proving the existence of HPV (1), evidence of abnormal chromosomes to be caused by the never-found HPV virus, and thus the the validity of the test.
(1) Hausen. A Papilloma DNA from a cervical cancer and its prevalence from cancer biopsy samples from different geographic regions. Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences, June 1983.
-No Virus particle was purified-isolated
-The origin of the DNA was not known
-Hybridization got < 0.1% match and was arbitrarily declared to be a new type.
Hey PM, thanks for that - a sterling example of turning non-supportive evidence into supportive by pulling a new 'virus' strain out of one's ass.
Here's the full text for anyone else who wants to have a read:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC394142/pdf/pnas00638-0279.pdf
Oh no Anthony this one was not pulled out of their ass, that would be called
condyloma acuminata
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547667/
This one came out of the other side...😮
nice job. Anthony. But aren't you preaching to the choir? Aluminum is not an "adjuvant", its a nuclear explosion in the body. Dead bugs and virii are inert, but novel.- pair their entry with Al, the most electro-positive ion )after fluoride)...and its that trauma that trains the body to be ever vigilant when it next encounters virtually anything else that entered at the same time (i.e. milk, egg, peanut proteins). When I was a kid we did not have peanut anaphylactic events. Now kids are deathly allergic to eggs, milk etc. Quite a deviously brilliant long-term end-game. Then they sell us Epi-Pens. (Don't get mad, get even...MB works better, is dirt cheap). And what's the deal with "Turbo-Cancers", WTF! The Establishment is unravelling. Can't trust anyone, 'cept one's own chops.
What is MB?
methylene blue
Who in the blazing hell puts their infant into an experimental program to have their very tiny innocent bodies invaded by these demons.
you never know IF these infants even existed... i would not be surprised if these "studies" are total fakes like hte viruses and vaccines. so no participants and no infants
I think this work should go...errrm...viral!!! If People need to know the truth, here is where it starts.
Beyond that, We might best do all We can to solve for those moneyed psychopaths in control.
We Had Better Solve for the Psychopaths in Control NOW! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/we-had-better-solve-for-the-psychopaths
Free Market Capitalism (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/free-market-capitalism
The End of (Social) Entropy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/the-end-of-entropy
I hate these evil people! They make my blood boil!
It takes 3 whole minutes to find out ‘factchecker’ organizations are funded by hundred millionaires to billionaires, every time. Therein lies the lies. Why every person on the planet can’t figure that out remains their only hope, and next victims.
Great Job! Thanks!
Sasha Latypova, Dr. Judy Makovits and Katherine Watt(i believe) wrote on the “Fact Checkers “ and Judy wrote extensively on pathetic - Peer Reviewed journals bias and collusion.
Steve Kirsch has a podcast.....talks with Cdn. doctor Makis
-Unstoppable Force meets Immovable Object?...wonder what AC thinks:
https://makismd.substack.com/p/new-podcast-15-minutes-with-drmakis-395?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=1385328&post_id=156085368&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=tcu7b&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
You could add the work of Hooker and Lyons-Weiler in here.
* Brian Hooker (Hooker, Miller 2020) - Health outcomes of vaxx vs unvaxx children - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32537156/
* Lyons-Weiler & Robert Ricketson (2018) - Reconsideration of the immunotherapeutic pediatric safe dose levels of aluminum- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.02.025
edit: add abstract snippet
"FDA regulations require safety testing of constituent ingredients in drugs (21 CFR 610.15). With the exception of extraneous proteins, no component safety testing is required for vaccines or vaccine schedules. The dosing of aluminum in vaccines is based on the production of antibody titers, not safety science"