I refer back to your previous post on this piece of dogshit, Anthony, when you wondered how he suddenly appeared.
He is so very unattractive - and here I'm not discussing his morals (for which the adjective would be utterly meaningless) - that there has to be someone who, manoeuvring his strings and making him dance up and down, is doing a very, very nasty Geppetto.
But do we even care ? - about him or the 'beautiful' Yiannopoulos ?
Yes, I often feel like I'm preaching to the converted. But hopefully people are using the "share" button and discussing this stuff outside of Substack with receptive folks.
Andrew Tate is not "white passing" at all, that is unless you live in deepest, darkest Africa.
Another thing to notice is that Tate is being promoted by mainstream conservative media, just as Milo was. A good rule of thumb for those who cannot immediately tell is that anyone boosted by the mainstream media is fake and gay.
Andrew Tate is intel apparatus all the way. And either gay, or EGI? Given his obviousness, questions will fly.
Tate is culture creation. And no one is bigger in influence or more organized at culture creation than the intelligence apparatus. That's their bread and butter.
What a mess! And, of course, money promotes the Ones who are thusly, the scum of Humanity, the psychopaths, to the top. To own the media, governments, and all the rest...
I’m late to this game, but Andrew’s chest tattoo looks like a coverup for a previous tattoo. He admits to having had a butterfly tattoo and then covering it up, but I suspect he had an even gayer tattoo on his chest and needed a lot of ink to cover that one up.
What they want is for us to believe the BS and talk about them in their pre-arranged context. They don't want us pointing out the facts. Leaving the mainstream narrative unchallenged won't make the likes of Tate go away.
People not in the targeted demographic for a particular psy-op often do not understand how strong the influence is on those who are. I want to understand how and why these media creatures exist and who gains from pushing them on us. Thank you Anthony.
Interesting and likely spot-on take of the Tates.
Tate came out of nowhere and no doubt that's where he's headed.
I refer back to your previous post on this piece of dogshit, Anthony, when you wondered how he suddenly appeared.
He is so very unattractive - and here I'm not discussing his morals (for which the adjective would be utterly meaningless) - that there has to be someone who, manoeuvring his strings and making him dance up and down, is doing a very, very nasty Geppetto.
But do we even care ? - about him or the 'beautiful' Yiannopoulos ?
Moi non, pas du tout.
I couldn't give two shits about them as individual entities, but I do take great offence to the psy-oppery that they are a part of.
I know, I know ... you're a good man, driven by the need to point out vileness to the unthinking masses. And you always provide proof.
But I think the non-thinkers aren't here on your substack: your subscribers seem pretty clued-up to this old broad. :)
Yes, I often feel like I'm preaching to the converted. But hopefully people are using the "share" button and discussing this stuff outside of Substack with receptive folks.
hmm. i pegged them both for having been groomed. by intelligence,
Andrew Tate is not "white passing" at all, that is unless you live in deepest, darkest Africa.
Another thing to notice is that Tate is being promoted by mainstream conservative media, just as Milo was. A good rule of thumb for those who cannot immediately tell is that anyone boosted by the mainstream media is fake and gay.
Andrew Tate is intel apparatus all the way. And either gay, or EGI? Given his obviousness, questions will fly.
Tate is culture creation. And no one is bigger in influence or more organized at culture creation than the intelligence apparatus. That's their bread and butter.
What a mess! And, of course, money promotes the Ones who are thusly, the scum of Humanity, the psychopaths, to the top. To own the media, governments, and all the rest...
May We co-create vastly better!
Quantifying Wealth (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/quantifying-wealth
I’m late to this game, but Andrew’s chest tattoo looks like a coverup for a previous tattoo. He admits to having had a butterfly tattoo and then covering it up, but I suspect he had an even gayer tattoo on his chest and needed a lot of ink to cover that one up.
In the end, who tf cares…just leave them alone. The more we talk about them, the more we talk about them! Kind of what they want, isn’t it?
What they want is for us to believe the BS and talk about them in their pre-arranged context. They don't want us pointing out the facts. Leaving the mainstream narrative unchallenged won't make the likes of Tate go away.
People not in the targeted demographic for a particular psy-op often do not understand how strong the influence is on those who are. I want to understand how and why these media creatures exist and who gains from pushing them on us. Thank you Anthony.
Expose them.