Peer-Reviewed FACT: What They are Calling 'Sars-Cov-2' Was Around Long Before December 2019

The inconvenient 'COVID' finding that no-one is talking about

The mainstream tale regarding the origins of ‘Sars-Cov-2’ - the alleged virus that causes the alleged influenza known as ‘COVID-19’ - is that it first struck in early December 2019 in the Chinese city of Wuhan. The virus allegedly emanated from a person - who has never been identified - who allegedly ate a bat or pangolin purchased at a Wuhan wet market - which researchers later revealed did not sell bats or pangolins.

That version doesn't make any sense, so naturally it's the version the mainstream ran with.

The other version that lurked in the background is that the virus emanated, by accident or design, from one of two biolabs situated in Wuhan. One of these labs was situated within 300 metres of the wet market, belonged to the the Wuhan Center for Disease Control & Prevention, and was a BSL-4 lab reportedly experimenting with coronaviruses.

Like others skeptical of the patently absurd wet market story, I initially believed the biolab origin theory. However, when the mainstream media - who had incessantly portrayed the lab theory as tinfoil paranoia - suddenly did an about-face and began giving it credence in May 2021, I started to smell a big, stinking, psy-op rat.

What had changed by May 2021? Not much of any substance, except the launch a few months earlier of the biggest drug scam in history. December 2020 saw the launch of new genetic therapies for COVID from companies with long track records of fraud, like Pfizer and AstraZeneca. It quickly became clear authorities wanted to cajole each and every one of us into getting injected with the dubious new drugs. What better way to overcome 'vaccine hesitancy' (newspeak for the perfectly rational disinclination to take shady, unproven drugs made by shady, criminal corporations) than to impress upon people that not only was Sars-Cov-2 novel, but supranormal.

Humans have ingested the flesh of animals for millions of years, and have closely co-existed with them since the advent of agriculture circa 10,000 years ago. Our immune systems had long since adapted to the threat of 'zoonotic' pathogens.

But this was something very different, or so we were supposed to believe. This was a mystery virus, potentially a 'man-made' one, the likes of which the human immune system had never encountered before.

Using the kind of logic you'd find in a boofheaded, boganistic 1980s Aussie beer ad, a man-made virus needs a man-made vaccine, right?

You can get it watchin' the news. You can get it listenin' to Dan Andrews. You can feel it comin' on about four. A big virus paranoia needs a big, cold gene therapy that must be kept at -70C during all stages of the distribution cycle. And the best, cold gene therapy is Comirnaty, made by a criminal corporation with a 70-year track record of fraud convictions.

There's just one wee problem with the novel virus story: It's complete nonsense.

The Great Continental Corona Con

Spain, where they drink Alhambra and Estrella instead of rancid pee like Victoria Bitter, quickly became a leading COVID 'hotspot' during the Great Corona Con.

And it was supposedly Italy’s fault.

The story goes like this: Sars-Cov-2, after 'jumping' from a bat/pangolin to humans in Wuhan, then boarded a plane with its human hosts to Lombardy, which became Italy's 'hardest hit' region for the new Woohoo flu.

Upon touching down in Milan, the spritely Woohoo virus then 'jumped' from the Wuhan natives onto some Lombardians. As it was jumping around, it landed on some fans of the Milanese football team Atalanta, which on February 19 played off against visiting Spanish team Valencia. Some 40,000 Atalanta fans gathered at the stadium, "engaging in manifestations of euphoria like hugging, shouting, all of that could’ve favored viral reciprocation,” according to immunologist, Francesco Le Foche.

There is no actual evidence that a single case of any novel flu was caused by this football game, but hey, they had a good tale going here. So good, you might think it was concocted beforehand. I certainly do. But there I go again, acting like a critical thinker instead of a ridiculous coincidence theorist.

Anyways, on March 10, the two teams faced off again, this time at Valencia’s Mestalla Stadium.

The rest is history. The kind written by those in charge. Sars-Cov-2, having finally arrived in Spain, liked what it saw and used the 'superspreader' football matches as its springboard to permanent residency.

Within a few days of Valencia vs Atalanta II, Spain conveniently instituted a national lockdown, following a similar measure enacted in Italy. Much of the world then followed suit, including Australia where people shout at football matches but don't hug, because in Australia men don't hug. Instead, they wipe the sweat off their brow in an exaggerated motion to portray uber manliness, then drink VB to satisfy a hard-earned thirst. After taking a long, manly swig of beer, they then make that macho exhalation sound that represents the quenching of a hard-earned thirst. They then go get injected with dodgey drugs to protect themselves from a super-scary virus that has a 99.9% survival rate.

2020: The year toxic masculinity gave way to toxic cowardice.

Once again, the Sars-Cov-2 origin tale sounds like a great story, but it's all bollocks. In fact, the Straight Outta Wuhan story contains more bollocks than a Spanish bull farm.

Sars-Cov-2 Was In Spain Long Before February 2020

OK, so you've heard the globalist fable, now let's get down to the science.

On June 13, 2020, researchers from the University of Barcelona posted a muy, muy interesante study in pre-print form. You can access it right here.

Each week, from April 13, in the peak of the 'pandemic', to May 25, the researchers examined raw sewage samples from two large wastewater treatment plants in Barcelona for the presence of Sars-Cov-2.

Their testing confirmed the presence of Sars-Cov-2 in Barcelona sewerage.

But the researchers didn't stop there. Before I explain what they did next, it is worth reiterating that the first 'COVID' case in Barcelona (and one of the first in continental Spain) was reported on February 25, 2020.

For one of the treatment plants, archived sewerage samples from December 2019 to May 2020 were available, so the researchers decided to test them too.

"Unexpectedly," wrote the researchers, "analysis of archival samples revealed the increasing occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 genomes in samples from January 15 to March 4." Which means 'Sars-Cov-2' was detected in sewage dating back 41 days before declaration of the first COVID-19 case in Barcelona.

So, in Barcelona, the supposedly super-deadly, super-virulent virus had actually been living in people's poopers without incident as far back as January 15.

But wait, there's more.

Remember how there were two wastewater plants involved in the study? Well, the second plant also had archived sewerage samples. After their "unexpected" findings from the first plant, they decided to analyze archived samples from the second plant dating back to January 2018.

Lo and behold, a sample from March 12, 2019 also tested positive for the Woohoo virus. "This striking finding," wrote the researchers, "indicates circulation of the virus in Barcelona long before the report of any COVID-19 case worldwide."

A full eight months before the first reported cases in Wuhan, and a full 12 months before COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, it could be detected in Barcelona sewerage.

Oops.

When Evidence Disputes the Agenda, Just Ignore It

To call the University of Barcelona findings disruptive would be a massive understatement. They completely upended the entire official fairy tale concerning the origins of Sars-Cov-2.

How the media and researchers dealt with this inconvenient discovery was interesting, to say the least.

The first step was to play down the findings. The mainstream media and oligarch-funded fact-checkers couldn't write off the Barcelona researchers as tinfoil quacks; one of the researchers was Albert Bosch, a decorated virologist, professor, President of the Spanish Society for Virology and Chair of the General Assembly of the International Society for Food and Environmental Virology.

Bosch is about as mainstream as you can get, so lambasting him and his team as a bunch of conspiracist screwballs was out of the question. The media was forced to employ more subtle, diplomatic methods of downplaying the findings.

"There are several explanations for this positive result," proffered The Conversation, which like all good bastions of 'fact-checking' (read: propaganda reinforcement) is funded by a plethora of globalist mega-foundations including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

"One is that SARS-CoV-2 is present in the sewage at a very low level."

Whatever - it is still present. In Spain. Some eight months before the official story would have us believe the virus launched its World Domination Tour from China.

"Another is that the test reaction was accidentally contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 in the laboratory. This sometimes happens in labs as positive samples are regularly being handled, and it can be difficult to prevent very small traces of positive sample contaminating others."

Oh really now? Interesting that.

"Another explanation is that there is other RNA or DNA in the sample that resembles the test target site enough for it to give a positive result at the 39th cycle of amplification."

You don't say.

A USA Today 'fact check,' meanwhile, also tried to diminish the findings by writing that "a positive finding can result from a variety of scenarios, including contamination from a positive sample or a false positive."

Okay, stop. Just stop already.

The method of testing the Barcelona researchers used revolved around the same shambolic Corman-Drosten PCR test that underpinned the entire scamdemic. Outlets like USA Today and The Conversation were more than happy to fan the flames of hysteria by citing untenable data that was built upon this farcical test.

But when a result contradicting the official narrative is obtained using this same WHO- and CDC-endorsed testing method, all of a sudden we must be mindful of false positives, lab contamination, and excessive amplification cycles?!?

You mean the very same factors that rendered the hysterical daily case counts a load of untenable nonsense?

Seriously? Am I the only one sickened by this elephantine hypocrisy?

If these geniuses backpedaled any harder, they'd tear their hamstrings!

"More Confirmation Needed"; None is Forthcoming

USA Today concluded "these findings have not yet been peer-reviewed and no definitive conclusion should be made until more studies are done."

The Conversation also insisted "until further studies are carried out, it is best not to draw definitive conclusions."

While I think both USA Today and The Conversation stink like long-expired milk, they are actually saying something sensible here. Novel research findings of any import always require confirmation in the form of replication.

But do you think that is what happened, in a situation where subsequent confirmation would have blown the official narrative to bits?

When Bosch and his colleagues finally had their paper published in peer-reviewed form in April 2021, I was dismayed to see no mention whatsoever of their pre-2020 positive test results.

The researchers did mention the January 15, 2020 positive, but the positive sample from March 2019 - despite its critical importance - was completely ignored.

And so, on March 22, 2023, I sent the following email to Bosch and his co-author Rosa Pintó:

I'd love to share their response with you but, despite emailing not one but two of the authors, I still haven't received one as of April 28, 2023.

I'd be lying if I said I don't smell another rat here. Had the researchers retested the March 19, 2019 sample and it returned negative, hey, no shame in that. It would hardly be the first time in history a novel finding had failed replication. The researchers could have replied, "Hi Anthony, the reason we excluded the March 2019 result is that we retested it, or it was retested by [insert name of independent lab], and it came back negative."

Instead my email has been met with stone cold silence, which suggests to me the researchers have either deduced or been told that pursuing the inconvenient March 2019 finding might not be in their best interests.

It's Not Just Spain

In Italy, the first laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 case was identified in Lombardy on February 20, 2020.

So you can imagine the surprise of researchers who retrospectively tested plasma samples from 959 asymptomatic Lombardians enrolled in a prospective lung cancer screening trial between September 2019 and March 2020.

Sars-Cov-2 antibodies were detected in 111 (11.6%) of the participants, with positives starting from September 2019.

Another group of researchers identified Sars-Cov-2 RNA in an oropharyngeal swab specimen collected from a child with suspected measles in early December 2019, around 2 months before the first aforementioned identified case in Italy.

Yet another group of Italian researchers analyzed 289 samples (all oropharyngeal swabs and urine samples) obtained in Lombardy since August 2018 as part of a rubella/measles surveillance program. Eleven of the Sars-Cov-2 positive samples were from the pre-pandemic period, with 9 of those emanating from 2019. The earliest testing positive for Sars-Cov-2 RNA was a urine sample collected September 12, 2019, from an 8-months old child whose serum was also IgG and IgM positive.

Researchers from Rome analyzed samples from five wastewater treatment plants in three cities and regions in northern Italy (Milan/Lombardy, Turin/Piedmont and Bologna/Emilia Romagna); 24 of these samples were collected between September 2018 and June 2019. A total of 15 positive samples were confirmed using both nested RT-PCR and real-rime RT-PCR assays. The earliest positives dated back to 18 December 2019 in Milan and Turin which, according to the official tale, is right when the Woohoo virus was still finding its legs in Wuhan and yet to begin racking up the frequent flyer points.

Pre-Pandemic Italian 'Sars-Cov-2': It's Not Just For Northerners Anymore

The real cracker was a study involving serum samples collected between January 2018 and December 2019, from subjects with a variety of pathologic conditions in Southern Italy.

Those familiar with the modern history of Italy will know the Northerners and Southerners often consider themselves an entirely separate breed from each other (genetically, culturally and ancestrally, there's actually some truth to this, but let's focus on one heated controversy at a time). Irrespective of their differences, it seems the one thing they do share in common is a propensity for prematurely testing positive to viruses supposedly first detected in China.

Using a lateral flow assay kit (made, where else, in China) for the detection of antibodies against the nucleocapsid (N) protein of SARS-CoV-2, twenty-one of the 1150 serum samples from 2018-2019 tested positive.

After subjecting the samples to both urea dissociation testing, ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), or both, most of the positives could not be sustained, leading the researchers to dismiss the results as false positives. However, their results show that after being subjected to ELISA and urea, three of the samples still remained positive for Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against Sars-Cov-2 at both levels of urea exposure, similar to four of the 9 'positive' control samples.

Furthermore, of the mere six PCR-negative control samples used in the study, none showed any antibodies at all in response to pre-urea rapid tests and ELISA.

The researchers did briefly flirt with reality when they wrote in the study's second-last paragraph:

"In some of our subjects, positive serology may reflect a prior or current infection with other non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains due to some sequence similarities, as has previously been seen in individuals with negative SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR results and no symptoms of COVID-19."

Translated: COVID-19 tests are a load of non-specific pseudoscience that will detect non-related substances in your body and register them as 'Sars-Cov-2.'

That may not be what they really meant, but that's what their findings really showed, for reasons I'll fully elucidate in future articles.

Meanwhile, in the rest of the world ...

Carnaval da Sujeira

Home to 14 of the world's 50 most dangerous cities, the last thing Brazil should be worrying about is a virus with a near 100% survival rate. Nonetheless, COVID is a thing in Brazil, because the globalists who pull the puppet strings of liberal and conservative leaders have deemed it so.

Researchers from the Federal University of Santa Catarina detected Sars-Cov-2 in two human sewage samples collected independently on November 27, 2019.

The first diagnosed COVID-19 case in Brazil was on February 25, 2020.

Back in the USSA

In a finding the normally vocal CDC doesn't talk about, for some strange reason, its researchers detected Sars-Cov-2–reactive antibodies in blood specimens dating back as early as December 13-16, 2019. The specimens were obtained from from blood donations in California, Oregon, and Washington.

In the US, the first COVID-19 infection was reported on January 19, 2020 in a returned traveler from China, although 2 others within the first 12 alleged US cases had illness-onset dates of January 14, 2020. Either way, an entire month is a long time for a supposedly super-virulent, super-deadly virus to sit around unnoticed.

South of the Border

Edging out Brazil in the world's 50 most deadly cities list, with a count of 15, is Mexico. Again, influenza viruses are the least of this troubled country's woes, but that hasn't stopped COVID paranoia from pervading Mexico.

Mexican researchers detected anti-Sars-Cov-2 IgG antibodies in sera from healthy blood donors as far back as November 2018 and May and November 2019, which corresponded to a woman, aged 44 years, and two men, aged 45 and 28 years, respectively.

So for some 15 months prior to the WHO declaring a 'pandemic', it seems what is allegedly Sars-Cov-2 was already in Mexico and killing no-one who wasn't already vulnerable and ready to succumb to regular influenza (which is all that COVID ever was). Meanwhile, a record high of nearly 35,000 people were murdered in Mexico in 2019 alone, according to official data.

You figure out which Mexico should really worry about: The Woohoo flu, or people getting their heads blown off in bloody drug wars.

And China?

It's only fitting I close this article with China, which is where this entire farce allegedly began in December 2019. And that's the story the Chinese are sticking to, with researchers from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences claiming in a recent paper:

"Our findings showed no SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies existing among blood donors in Wuhan, China before 2020, indicating no evidence of transmission of COVID-19 before December 2019 in Wuhan, China."

In Conclusion

Multiple research groups around the world have detected the supposed novel virus in wastewater and human fluid samples that date back to long before the 'pandemic' allegedly kicked off in Wuhan.

Trying to dismiss these results as probable false positives, a la USA Today and The Conversation, is untenable given they were obtained using widely accepted testing methods for Sars-Cov-2.

This, then, means one of two things:

The first possibility is that Sars-Cov-2 is real and novel, but nowhere near as novel as claimed. This raises the question of how such an allegedly dangerous and hyper-virulent virus was able to at once travel around the world and yet cause so little disruption for so long.

The other possibility is that the Sars-Cov-2 story is a pre-orchestrated load of codswallop and that the accepted testing methods for Sars-Cov-2 are a pseudoscientific sham that detect a host of particles that are not only not Sars-Cov-2, but often are not infectious agents of any sort. Which, after examining the evidence, is the only conclusion I can come to.

Those whose brains are about to burst with incredulity at that last contention might want to watch the video below, in which none other than Fauci himself admits PCR tests run with a Ct of 36 or more - standard practice during the scamdemic - are of “miniscule” value and are detecting "just dead nucleotides, period" (4:28).

His words, not mine, folks.

A special thanks to Juan, my Argentinian hermano de otra madre who originally alerted me to this line of research. I should be out on a ride or walking my dog, but here I am instead writing about wastewater samples. Thanks brother :)

The Mandatory “I Ain’t Your Mama, So Think For Yourself and Take Responsibility for Your Own Actions” Disclaimer: All content is provided for information and education purposes only. Individuals wishing to make changes to their dietary, lifestyle, exercise or medication regimens should do so in conjunction with a competent, knowledgeable and empathetic medical professional. Anyone who chooses to apply the information on this substack does so of their own volition and their own risk. The author/s accept no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any harm, real or imagined, from the use or dissemination of information contained on this substack. If these conditions are not agreeable to the reader, he/she is advised to leave this substack immediately.